Lincoln united his party and saved America from the Democrats for the first time. Can Trump save America for the second time?
Lincoln united his party and saved America from the Democrats for the first time. Can Trump save America for the second time?
Sunday Mail columnist and author, Peter Hitchens was barred from giving a speech at Portsmouth University on Tuesday 12th February 2019.
He had been prepared to make the two hour journey to Portsmouth at his own expense and not even charge a fee. However, the snowflakes of the LGBT+ community at the university decided that he had made unacceptable comments in the past about LGBT matters and, as they had just completed their pride month to celebrate themselves, his presence would not be appreciated.
They did not tell him specifically that he had been barred, but that his event had been ‘delayed’; i.e. postponed.
In Peter Hitchens’ eloquent words: “…the truth is that they stopped the event because they don’t like my opinions. That proves they cannot be trusted with freedom of speech. They came up with one pretext for policing thought and imposing censorship this time. They are equally capable of coming up with another, whenever required.”
As he pointed out to Eden Ladley, the LGBT+ officer for the Portsmouth Students Union (UPSU), the delay was a human decision, not one brought on by physical barriers such as structural failure in the building.
He went on to say: “I suspect that many students have far too few chances to hear views that are different from the standard-issue conformist Leftism that is their normal diet. What upsets me about this ban is that it is a general menace to freedom of speech, thought and assembly.”
There were two petitions over whether Peter Hitchens should attend. 129 said he should not and 55 said he should. This is out of a student population of 23,000 which means only 0.8% participation and I am fairly sure that the vast majority of the students were never consulted.
I am wholly in agreement with Peter Hitchens. He is a superb and entertaining speaker who loves debate. It is a huge loss to those students who are still free thinkers, but Leftist ideologues always act as though they have the authority to speak for all when they have no such mandate. It belies their authoritarian conviction in their own self-righteousness an is indicative of a pernicious form of narcissism.
I have many issues with Peter Hitchens, but free speech is not one of them. Free speech is about the right to risk offence. It is not hate speech even though some may think it is. From UPSU’s comments on the subject, they clearly do not understand the concept.
I used to be a huge fan of Peter Hitchen, but he has long since fallen off the pedestal that I once placed him on.
I found that his opinionated views on President Trump and Tommy Robinson (Stephen Yaxley-Lennon) along with his failure to highlight the massive problem with high level incompetence and criminal activities, which are bringing western countries to their knees, smack of being complicit to the gross treason of leaders to towards the people they are supposed to represent.
Peter Hitchens arrogantly proclaims that people can either follow him or Tommy Robinson and condemns those who would choose the latter. Personally, I am not impressed with mandatory directives. It is the likes of Tommy Robinson who have brought the subject of mass violence inflicted on children in the UK to the fore. He was the one who stood against the abuse that our soldiers endured on their return from campaigns abroad. He did so in the face of cynical criticism from the media. Peter Hitchens, as with the rest of the privileged clan of journalists, says nothing and offers nothing. All he does is sneer at the messenger of the inferior social class.
Peter Hitchens is not the one picking up the pieces of their lives after their teenage son has been run down by an Islamic thug. Tommy Robinson is boots on the ground and reporting it.
Peter Hitchens’ has proven to be unreliable as an ally as highlighted by James Delingpole (Breitbart). He has been bewilderingly two-faced on Brexit – showing glowing happiness that people voted for it and then criticising the outcome.
I am drawn to the conclusion that Peter Hitchens is an Oxbridge post-graduate snob. In spite of his seemingly controversial views, he belongs to an intellectual elite that look down their noses at the rest of us. He thinks he knows more than he does, but is detached from the sufferings of ordinary people.
To his class, people like Donald Trump and Stephen Yaxley-Lennon are regarded as impudent and vulgar upstarts that should have no place in the corridors of power. The fact that the reason why we are in such a mess today, with white girls being molested on an industrial scale, is because elitist snobs like Peter Hitchens, say nothing and do nothing.
One invective against Trump becoming President was that he was not qualified (as if you had to have some sort of certificate). By claiming this he implies that Hillary Clinton would be better. His obliviousness of her many high level crimes is plain to see as might be the case for those who live closeted lives. The thousands of deaths (including multiple murders) that lay squarely at Clinton’s door would make the Emperor Caligula look like a traffic warden by comparison. Trump has something like 75 structures erected across the globe. That took a lot of negotiating and a lot of understanding of foreign countries. May be that is why he got the red carpet treatment when he went to China (unlike Obama)? Trump has been bringing the prospect of real peace in Korea. He has enriched and seriously helped the American working classes.
Peter Hitchens chooses not to see these things, but clings to his arrogant, filtered view of things. It is clear from his comments that he does not know what is going on in the world. He says on his spat with UPSU: “This is what is coming. It begins like this, and it ends with arrests of dissidents at four in the morning, conducted by people who are quite sure that what they are doing is right.”
These things are happening now! Tommy Robinson is not the only casualty of fascist weaponizing of the law against dissenters. It has been happening to hundreds of ordinary folk who mis-gender people or who express ‘wrong think’ or who have decried Islam. Police have already been turning up to snatch free thinking people from their homes.
A cross party group of MPs is drawing up legislation to make criticism of Islam a crime. With this, it can confidently be assumed that Free Speech is dead in the UK and where are the elitist media?
In his criticism of Tommy Robinson he refers to a “very well researched article” by one of his Mail colleagues. The article is full of pejorative terms that detract from any hope of objective reporting. Peter Hitchens aligns himself with bilge like this. He is an enjoyable person to listen to and has a lot to say, but there is no substance to his words.
Journalism is in the sewer as many reporters live in different circles to the rest of us. Peter Hitchens should be in the vanguard to restore trust and truth, but instead wallows in the mud of deceit like the rest of his cohort. Why should anybody follow him or any other elitist?
One of the features of evil (desire or intention to inflict harm for selfish gain) is how those imbued with it will play the victim card to dishonestly garnish resources, support and sympathy.
There are few more putrid sects in the world today than those from the cult of radicalized feminism. The amount of resources they dupe from sympathetic individuals and public finances runs into hundreds of millions of pounds/ dollars. Those that fact check their exaggerated claims about women’s suffering often do so, not to help those women, but to fill their coffers with the ‘gold’ of the gullible (which is usually somebody else’s money) and to promote their career and status as virtuous saints of the modern age.
Nasty women do not know how to scale down their own aggression when on the attack. They seem to lack a mental gauge that should tell them when to stop or to drop the subject of their angst. I have witnessed vile language coming from women in the streets who cannot help to denigrate a man in public.
It is an Achilles heel for many men when they have to deal with a malevolent, confrontational, demanding or banshee woman. They often really do not know what to do or how to cope with the threat. Men will either (1) walk away, (2) absorb the vitriol or (3) turn to aggression.
Men are forced to choose one of the three options due to their ineptitude in resolving disputes with women. They feel that whatever tactics they deploy almost invariably ends up bad for them or for some other innocent guy who stands in the way of the bullet.
Usually men do not choose to become aggressive in public because they know it would invite a world of trouble for them. Members of the public tend to be total hypocrites in male-female disputes. They will refuse to intervene when a man is “getting it in the neck” i.e. subject to abuse. However, should he lay a hand on her, they are right there transmitting how narcissistically virtuous they are by defending women regardless of how obnoxious she may be.
Ironically, it is in this regard, that men need women most. Men need level headed conservative type women to protect them from the aggression of a vicious female. In fact social experiments show that it is usually only women who will intervene to defend a man from abuse. Now when I say ‘conservative’, I am not referring to politics. I mean women who respect men and women for the characters that they are rather than the identity group they belong to. These women do not have to be any relationship with the man but, just as a kindly stranger may help someone in need of rescue, so a man being raked over the coals needs another woman to help him.
There are such women and they can be of any age or social group, but they are like gold dust. They are the truly virtuous ones because they apply decent principles to their actions and tend to understand the dilemma of men who are under attack from women.
Women who defend men should always be treasured and treated with the utmost respect. Many of them will have their brothers, fathers, husbands or boyfriends and some may have sons. However, they know that the dynamics and power of inter-sex relations lies with women and not with men. Many will have been brought up and have learned how males think and act from an early age. They will have seen real prejudice is inflicted on their beloved male associates while the victim-claiming women use feminist doctrines to fleece the system and men of money, assets and especially their children. Feminists are parasites who spread their poison for personal gain and good women know it that is why the vast majority of women refute feminism. Feminism has become anchored to the sentiments of hatred of the male and a lust for the material resources that men provide (most commonly through taxation).
The feminist harpies of politics, education and law are plentiful. They have real power to affect the lives of women, men and especially children for good or bad. However, the modern feminist has two prime aims. The first one is for self gratification and the second is promoting their cause i.e. spreading their poison. Both aims feed their own toxic narcissism.
They have no real concern for the interest of women; that is a pretence that is used to garnish resources from the unsuspecting and the gullible.
When in positions that decide the fate of others, they tend to have a predetermined (prejudicial) view of how they believe things should be and then try to force reality to conform to their way of thinking. This is what feminist prejudice is. The toxicity of feminist poison seeps into all areas and will often be practiced by those who do not consider themselves feminists. It is why men are at a disadvantage when it comes to determining child custody arrangements. Feminism couples with the internalized thinking that women should be protected and males punished and is why males on trial tend to get harsher sentences.
Feminism is full of contradictions and has many damaging logical arguments against it, but the feminist counter is to simply dismiss objectivity as being patriarchal, misogynistic and immoral.
From my research, I have found that 5% of women have sociopathic tendencies; 0.5% are psychopathic and probably about 20% more carry some form of psychotic condition.
Men-Going-Their-Own-Way (MGTOW) individuals long ago declared they want as little to do with women as possible. But, this is condemning good and bad women alike when what should be encouraged is engaging and helping the good women to flourish. Malevolent women need to be called out and shamed for their wickedness, but men need good women to do it.
There is a desperate need to screen out feminist cultists since they are causing lifelong harm to children and fostering hatred to be a more dominant emotion than love for young adults. Men are useless at combating this negativism. By contrast, truly good and virtuous women shine in the lives of all who care and especially children.
For men trying to date women, you have to be blunt and direct. Do not waste time on feminists. They will suck resources out of you and chuck you when they have no further need for you.
If a woman is authoritarian – chuck her.
If a woman declares herself a feminist – chuck her.
If she is neurotic and self centred – chuck her.
If she expects you to pay for everything –chuck her.
If you are in a long line of former boyfriends – chuck her.
If she is a pathological liar – chuck her.
If she does not make time for you –chuck her.
Basically, you should ask her about herself. Be blunt and ask her. If she is offended, so-be-it; you will know something already. It’s best to get things straight from the start rather than let a monster screw your life up and kill your heart. If you leave things you will get too deeply in and find yourself forking out just to keep the relationship going. The longer you leave it, the more painful the split.
On the other hand, if you have a girl who is cool then hold onto her and pay her due respect.
If she turns out to be an angel, then paradise is just around the corner.
Get with the right woman and life is peachy.
The right woman and the right man are complimentary to each other and together can create some great kids for a better future, not just for that couple, but for many others.
It is very easy to become dependent on single things. This could be a reliance on one person or a single income stream or even a single energy source. All of us can find some aspect of our lives where this is the case. Being single source dependent can be lucrative, convenient and what everyone else is doing. However, it is only great for the period for when there exists a plentiful supply. Once the ‘water hole’ runs dry, then what do you do?
In Big Tech, internet services provided by mega companies like Google and Apple have led to many people becoming dependent on them in a variety of ways. They enable people to showcase creative content; to run businesses and to exchange personal messages. However, as the saying goes “Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely” and so it is that the assault on free speech and the shutting down of alternative views is well underway.
Many hundreds have found themselves being demonetized, de-platformed and even banned for simply saying the wrong thing or holding the wrong views. In London alone, people have been arrested and charged with the offence of “Hate Speech” because they said the wrong thing. It makes you wonder if any of those executing these policies have read any history books or George Orwell.
Worryingly, it is not just the wroth of censorship that wrong-thinkers are having to cope with. I will call them “Dissidents” because that is effectively what they are. Dissidents can now find themselves ‘hunted down’, doxed (having personal details published for all to see); their children risk being removed from their care. They can also their jobs and be declined employment.
The concept of free speech is hanging by a thread and even those who never publish a word on the internet, find themselves fearful of expressing their views to colleagues, friends and family in case there are repercussions from word of their hate-think being found out.
Recently, I went in search of an oil-fired Hurricane lantern. Like most people, my household has become increasingly reliant on electricity (in its various delivery forms). The flick of a switch has become so customary that it is hard to live a day without the marvels and comfort that electricity brings.
A hurricane lantern does not just emit good light, it is also a rudimentary provider of heat. It is safer than candles since the flame is enclosed. It is light and easy to use and you can adjust the wick to increase or decrease luminosity. The point of it is that it is largely independent of centrally controlled power and heat.
I eventually found what I was looking for on Ebay for a price of just £7.39 (which included shipping costs). The problem came when I tried to pay for it.
My trusty Barclay’s Debit card was rejected with no explanation given. A polite Ebay helper phoned me up, but was unable to resolve the problem. He suggested that I contact my bank, but revealed that Pay Pal processed card payments, even though I had deliberately avoided using Pay Pal on the payment options.
A few weeks earlier I had cancelled my Pay Pal account and told them that I did not agree with their policy of compelling censorship of individuals that did not meet their version of ethical standards i.e. having non-left-wing views. To me financial organizations should not indulge in political sanctioning. To do so, smacks of real fascism and is extremely sinister for me, especially since I was brought up in a household that had been intimately affected by two world wars.
There are moves afoot to turn our society into a cashless one where payments will be made through bank transactions, phone apps and cards. That is now, but it does not stop there because already the use of microchip technology has been introduced to workers in Sweden. Some workers have already agreed to having a rice-grain sized micro-chip planted in the web of skin between forefinger and thumb. It allows them access through certain doors and can be used to operate cars. How wonderfully convenient for consumers and workers! However, it is also wonderfully convenient for unscrupulous control by totalitarians who can turn off your access to resources on the whims of their desires. Dissident tongues in China are already suffering due to Government controlled sanctions provided by Google-type technology, and that is without any implants. It does not take a genius to work out where this leads to.
We are tracked every second of every day. While most people are harmless sheeple they are only regarded as such if they conform. Make an error of judgement such as overstay your time in a parking bay or mutter some ‘hate speech’ phrase under your breath and expect to suffer the oppression of a weaponized legal system brought to bear.
You do not even have to have done anything wrong. By existing as a white male, you can find yourself marginalized by an increasingly corrupt anti-human system with its army of humanoid bots. The hostility that is being fostered against this sexual and racial group has disturbing similarities to what the Jews in Nazi Germany faced.
White males are being denigrated as being privileged (even those born poor and raised by a single mother in the backstreets of Sheffield). This blatant policy of racial and gender hatred is being driven by an extremely pernicious group of actual privileged and bigoted people who have wormed their way into positions of influence and power in government and industry. It means the poor white boy from Sheffield can expect to be denied what few opportunities may have been available. He can expect to be skipped over in job applications or made to stand at the back of the queue if he needs help.
If a revolution would provide us with hope and the possibility of respite, then it looks like that time is long past. Gloomy and miserable a picture I may be painting, but I fear that we humans are in terminal decline and the humans that are becoming more prevalent have a tendency to be more narcissistic, less informed and with more of a leaning towards egotistically driven violence. To talk is to risk condemnation for wrong-think and so no one talks. This kind of population replacement inhibits the desire to work out differences and to find working solutions. Instead, of tolerance and diversity of thought, we are forced to adopt ill-considered dictates that ignore reason, evidence and reality. It stands to destroy all that was ever good because of lacking the capacity to understand it. The arrogant new age controllers who believe they know the truth of things while worshiping delusion, want gratification now, not because they need it, but because it is what their infantile minds demand. They lack the ability and patience to create, design and construct. Instead, they are addicted to the dopamine hits they get from destruction, the power they wield and the harm of those most of whom they do not even know. Regrettably that mindset will be the death of us all, including all other life forms.
It may seem like paranoia but, if you have not already started then you need to get ready for the time when the electricity fails; the money supply dries up; the thought police come to your home; your food supply becomes prohibitively expensive and rarefied.
You need to prepare for survival, including having adequate defence and protection for your person, your family and your essential supplies. We should all be striving to establish an independent resource supply, but we also need a strategy for it to have a chance of working. It is too late when you have invaders, who may well be psychopathic, and you are having to beg for their mercy while they plunder your precious resources and harm your loved ones.
We need to diversify as many aspects of our lives as possible, so that we are not beholden to those who mean us ill while masquerading as our friends.
According to lawyer Robert Barnes, who is representing several of the families, the team will include at least five lawyers from five different law firms — all with a record of high profile civil cases.
A group of students from Covington Roman Catholic School had been taking part in a March for Life rally ain Washington DC. It is an all male school and some of the boys were as young as 14.
They had split up into groups afterwards to do some sightseeing, but had been told be at the Lincoln Memorial by 5.30 pm to catch their buses for the return trip to Kentucky. Most arrived at 4.30 pm
When they started assembling there were 4 or 5 African-American protesters near the steps. They identified as the Black Hebrew Israelites group. The boys kept away from them who then started hurling abuse and racist comments. From their own film, the protesters called the boys “racists,” “bigots,” “white crackers,” “faggots,” and “incest kids.” They also taunted an African American student from the school by telling him that we would “harvest his organs.”
One student asked a teacher chaperone for permission to begin school spirit chants to counter the hateful things that were being shouted at them. The chants are used at sporting events and all positive in nature. The chants were loud because they wanted to drown out the hateful comments that were being shouted at them.
However, another group of Native American protesters arrived and approached the boys. The lead man was Nathan Phillips who began banging his drum and walked right into the group. The boys parted for him to let him through. Phillips was filmed going right up to one of the boys, Nick Sandmann who was wearing a red MAGA hat.
Phillips came within inches of Nick’s face continually banging his drum. The boy was not sure what his intentions were so he stood his ground and smiled.
Everything was filmed by different cameras, but then the vile insults started. CNN were among the leaders along with many mainstream Fake News outlets. The boys were condemned as racists and bigots and all manner of threats and vulgarities vomited out. Calls for violence and obscenities to be visited upon the boys came from shrieking and hysterical celebrities. The malevolent sentiments were widely echoed across America and around the world aided and abetted by what have become know as the Fake News media.
However, among the abusing mob were the boys own clerics who threatened to have them expelled and were more than a little quick to throw their own children to the wolves without bothering to at least fact check first.
Phillips, a long time Leftist activist tried to play the victim card by making claims of racism and abuse that were not backed up by the extensive evidence of the available film footage.
This report could be many pages long, so it is best to display the pictures and play the Chimes Media video, Covington Facecrime.
I will say, that if you cannot speak with the real bigots that hate white people, that hate men (especially white men) who hate western society, that hate the culture that is responsible for 98% of inventions in the modern world; that has done most to bring freedom to individuals whose ancestors had never known; if these people will not listen to reason, then talking is sadly over. The outcome is either we split and live separately or we fight and kill until one side wins.
When you step out of your front door and walk away from your home, you often have no idea where you might end up or what you will find. So, one Saturday morning I went on a venture to London and when you go there, you invariably find something of interest.
I was passing through Parliament Square, across the road from the Houses of Parliament and I discovered a group of black African people gathering Some of them had flags and on the flags was the name “Ambazonia”. As a journalist I took pictures.
Less than an hour after that, I came across them again. Many were strewn across Whitehall outside of Downing Street and stopping traffic.
The new name, Ambazonia, is derived from the name of the bay on their coastline, Ambas Bay and has also been referred to as being Amba Land. It is situated in the South West of Cameroon and is mainly English speaking as was the North of the country which became a part of Nigeria in 1961.
Ambazonia or South Cameroons declared independence from Cameroon (West Africa) in September 2017. It followed escalating unrest that culminated in the main Cameroon government carrying out a series of brutal attacks that have been described as genocidal in nature.
President Paul Biya has been president since 1982. That is 37 years. He would have to know what was going on, so he cannot wash his hands of the crimes being committed against these people. In fact, some of his language has led Cameroons to fear being ethnically cleansed.
There have been videos, pictures and reports produced to support the claims. These included indiscriminate killing, wholesale burning of villages, rapes and humiliating acts.
A petition by South Cameroons was presented to the United Nations and provided details of police raping students at a university.
The South Cameroons are English-speaking citizens of South Cameroons while the rest of Cameroon is French speaking and this is the crux of the matter.
The English citizens feel strongly, and not without justification, that they are being treated as second class citizens. From being blatantly penalized in the education system for being English speaking, things have degenerated into barbaric attacks. People have had their homes torched and their young people murdered.
Like a lot of third world states, Cameroon has been in receipt of large amounts of Foreign Aid from the United Nations. That seems to have stopped. Only to be replaced by support from France.
Like a number of places in West Africa, Cameroon has suffered vicious attacks by the dreaded Boko Haram, an extremist Islamic group renowned for their violent attacks, especially against children.
While they kidnap girls, boys suffer machete attacks and being burned alive. To combat this, Cameroon has developed its own special forces unit, presumably receiving specialist training from the French military. The Cameroon special forces have quickly gained a reputation for being just as brutal as Boko Haram.
The French authorities are allegedly taking the lead in resolving the issue in South Cameroons. How they are doing that is uncertain. The British role in the matter is to “Monitor the situation.”
Meanwhile, ten leaders of the Ambazonia separatist movement were arrested whilst in exile in Nigeria a year ago. They have been facing a Yaounde military tribunal, but have refused to identify as Cameroons. Instead there have been calls for them to be returned to the sanctuary of Nigeria.