BANNING TOMMY

Break the Mainstream Media control over your mind! Most people are shackled like zombies to their lies and selective bias. Stop paying the BBC licence fee and stop buying their crummy newspapers. Starve them of their funding just as they try to do to dissenters like Tommy Robinson.

The banning of Tommy Robinson from Facebook, Instagram (and one of his books on Amazon) came within 24 hours of his expose of the morally bankrupt BBC and their allies in the Mainstream Media (which is just about all of them).

Use of the term Far Right is a warning you are about to be subjected to propaganda

Long before Tommy Robinson hit the scene I, and other associates, had been battling the BBC for many years over their indifference and misrepresentation of men and boys by the media in favour of Marxist feminist doctrine. Men’s rights advocates have consistently been labelled as right wing extremist types and misogynists. The Marxist element insists on breaking up groups into oppressors and oppressed. To them, and with few exceptions, men are oppressors and women the oppressed. This view has been held with cult-like intensity in spite of a mountain of evidence disproving the theory.

The BBC has done very little to diffuse this concept. In fact advocates who courageously stepped forward to argue the case that men suffered every bit as badly as women in domestic abuse and even worse in terms of the justice system, homelessness and education would find themselves outnumbered 3 to 1 on panel discussions and TV sofa chats.

Tommy Robinson came in from a different angle. He saw the Islamification of Britain by mass migration as a serious threat to British culture and to non-Muslim citizens. Again, the model of Marxist thinking rears its ugly head since the media has nurtured the view that Muslims are the oppressed class while white males, such as Tommy Robinson, are the oppressors. The British establishment determined that Tommy Robinson posed a serious threat to their domination of public institutions and the media and, just as importantly, people’s thoughts. He did so by revealing what lies and propaganda are used to deceive and mind control the British public. He had to be silenced and killed if necessary to shut him up.

On Saturday 23rd February, he turned the tables on them. He had been the target of a hit-piece documentary by BBC’s flagship program Panorama. In his documentary, Panodrama, he used plants and hidden cameras to expose just how corrupt, racist, devious and contemptuous the BBC are towards ordinary, working class people.

His efforts demonstrated just how ideologically driven the BBC and the MSM really are. They are not honest journalists objectively reporting the news as it happens. Instead, they are more akin to political activists. What his expose also revealed was that big media and tech corporations are working hand in hand with each other to control and direct propaganda in a deliberate attempt to misinform and silence wrongthink.

Interestingly enough, the book that was banned off of Amazon was Mohammed’s Koran which is a critical look at Muslim’s holy book. What is more, one of the main executioners in banning Tommy Robinson was Muslim activist, Mohammed Shafiq, who is in the pay of BBC but also was able to get immediate access to Facebook executives and get another person banned. Can anyone do this to anyone else? The action has revealed how much in bed the establishment is with each other and how little ordinary people mean to them (apart from taking their money).

Break their control over your mind! Most people are shackled like zombies to their lies and selective bias. Stop paying the licence fee and stop buying their crummy newspapers. Starve them of their funding just as they try to do to dissenters like Tommy Robinson. They fear us, but they are utterly ruthless and pathological. They have been shown to be physically dangerous. There is supposedly no death penalty in the UK, but the state will withdraw protection, especially from political prisoners, making undesirable vulnerable to violence in prison. They will encourage violence by zombified gangs on peaceful protesters. They carry out brutal police raids on those who say the wrong thing or think wrongly. Meanwhile they have ignored and covered up for the rape of children. It is time they were shut down and put out of business. They are not our friends, but our thought managers. While they have their power, there is no real freedom of speech.

Southampton Red Pill Group

 

Black Label Logic  FULL ARTICLE

This is an extract from Black Label Logic on the Red-Blue pill theory regarding gender relations.: When I wrote the blue and red pill theoretical framework the goal was to identify the mutual exclusivity of the two frameworks. I deliberately left out the purple pill, as it requires its own essay due to the fact that it appears to contradict the mutual exclusivity that was outlined in the other essay. To define the purple pill, it is a position that seeks to enable a man to have the blue pill fantasy, while remaining red pill. In essence leveraging his red pill knowledge in order to experience the blue pill fantasy. In a sense, once a man learns red pill knowledge, it is impossible to return to the Matrix without significant dissonance, unlike Cypher, there is simply no way to have your mind wiped clean of all aspects of the red pill. It may be suppressed for a time, or channeled through a defense mechanism or two, but the idealism that is required for a true blue pill fantasy is gone and what remains is merely a hollow shell. Central to the blue pill fantasy is the idea of there being a “one“, a perfect partner who fulfills your every need. Leaving out the part where perfection is a human conception that has no place in reality, and if it did would at best exist in a moment by moment basis, there is no such thing as a perfect partner. Someone may be a better fit for you than another, in transient moments it may feel as they are perfect but this is an illusion. A man cannot at the same time accept AWALT and view his partner in the manner required for the blue pill. From my research on the topic, the reasoning behind a purple pill perspective is to attempt a circumnavigation of the principles that are core to the red pill, such s solipsism, hypergamy and “all women are like that“. It is also based in an illusion of control, through which if the husband is red pill enough, he can alter her biological firmware, through constant vigilance. Throughout history, female nature was socially controlled through various means, religion, social shaming and jurisprudence are some of them. For instance, British divorce law from pre-1900 where the husband would automatically gain custody over the children in the event of divorce played on a female being attached to her children to reduce branch swinging, and to police her behavior. Nathaniel Hawthorne’s “The Scarlet Letter“, demonstrates how social shaming and shunning could be utilized to reduce the tendency for hypergamy, through it having social and financial consequences. The severe biblical punishments for adultery served to further reduce the inherent tendencies of the human female. The purple pill perspective is therefore, that a man standing alone as long as he is alpha and red pill aware enough can be different from the myriad of other men who were unable to accomplish what an entire society creates incentives against. To make this essay comparable with the other essay, I will go through the purple pill perspective on each point from it.

Be Your Best Self So You Can Just Be Yourself

Chimes Media is viewer funded.

If you would be kind enough to donate please do so here: https://chimes.media/donations/ Please subscribe at https://www.subscribestar.com/chimes-media]]>

 

Banning of Peter Hitchens

Peter Hitchens Non Visit to Portsmouth University

Sunday Mail columnist and author, Peter Hitchens was barred from giving a speech at Portsmouth University on Tuesday 12th February 2019.
He had been prepared to make the two hour journey to Portsmouth at his own expense and not even charge a fee. However, the snowflakes of the LGBT+ community at the university decided that he had made unacceptable comments in the past about LGBT matters and, as they had just completed their pride month to celebrate themselves, his presence would not be appreciated.

Attack on Free Speech

They did not tell him specifically that he had been barred, but that his event had been ‘delayed’; i.e. postponed.

In Peter Hitchens’ eloquent words: “…the truth is that they stopped the event because they don’t like my opinions. That proves they cannot be trusted with freedom of speech. They came up with one pretext for policing thought and imposing censorship this time. They are equally capable of coming up with another, whenever required.”
 
 
 
 

Eden Ladley

 
As he pointed out to Eden Ladley, the LGBT+ officer for the Portsmouth Students Union (UPSU), the delay was a human decision, not one brought on by physical barriers such as structural failure in the building.
 
 
 
 
He went on to say: “I suspect that many students have far too few chances to hear views that are different from the standard-issue conformist Leftism that is their normal diet. What upsets me about this ban is that it is a general menace to freedom of speech, thought and assembly.
There were two petitions over whether Peter Hitchens should attend. 129 said he should not and 55 said he should. This is out of a student population of 23,000 which means only 0.8% participation and I am fairly sure that the vast majority of the students were never consulted.
I am wholly in agreement with Peter Hitchens. He is a superb and entertaining speaker who loves debate. It is a huge loss to those students who are still free thinkers, but Leftist ideologues always act as though they have the authority to speak for all when they have no such mandate. It belies their authoritarian conviction in their own self-righteousness an is indicative of a pernicious form of narcissism.
I have many issues with Peter Hitchens, but free speech is not one of them. Free speech is about the right to risk offence. It is not hate speech even though some may think it is. From UPSU’s comments on the subject, they clearly do not understand the concept.

The Video

Peter Hitchens – another Fake News Journalist

I used to be a huge fan of Peter Hitchen, but he has long since fallen off the pedestal that I once placed him on.
I found that his opinionated views on President Trump and Tommy Robinson (Stephen Yaxley-Lennon) along with his failure to highlight the massive problem with high level incompetence and criminal activities, which are bringing western countries to their knees, smack of being complicit to the gross treason of leaders to towards the people they are supposed to represent.
Peter Hitchens arrogantly proclaims that people can either follow him or Tommy Robinson and condemns those who would choose the latter. Personally, I am not impressed with mandatory directives. It is the likes of Tommy Robinson who have brought the subject of mass violence inflicted on children in the UK to the fore. He was the one who stood against the abuse that our soldiers endured on their return from campaigns abroad. He did so in the face of cynical criticism from the media.  Peter Hitchens, as with the rest of the privileged clan of journalists, says nothing and offers nothing. All he does is sneer at the messenger of the inferior social class.
Peter Hitchens is not the one picking up the pieces of their lives after their teenage son has been run down by an Islamic thug. Tommy Robinson is boots on the ground and reporting it.
Peter Hitchens’ has proven to be unreliable as an ally as highlighted by James Delingpole (Breitbart). He has been bewilderingly two-faced on Brexit – showing glowing happiness that people voted for it and then criticising the outcome.
I am drawn to the conclusion that Peter Hitchens is an Oxbridge post-graduate snob. In spite of his seemingly controversial views, he belongs to an intellectual elite that look down their noses at the rest of us. He thinks he knows more than he does, but is detached from the sufferings of ordinary people.
To his class, people like Donald Trump and Stephen Yaxley-Lennon are regarded as impudent and vulgar upstarts that should have no place in the corridors of power. The fact that the reason why we are in such a mess today, with white girls being molested on an industrial scale, is because elitist snobs like Peter Hitchens, say nothing and do nothing.
One invective against Trump becoming President was that he was not qualified (as if you had to have some sort of certificate). By claiming this he implies that Hillary Clinton would be better. His obliviousness of her many high level crimes is plain to see as might be the case for those who live closeted lives. The thousands of deaths (including multiple murders) that lay squarely at Clinton’s door would make the Emperor Caligula look like a traffic warden by comparison. Trump has something like 75 structures erected across the globe. That took a lot of negotiating and a lot of understanding of foreign countries. May be that is why he got the red carpet treatment when he went to China (unlike Obama)? Trump has been bringing the prospect of real peace in Korea. He has enriched and seriously helped the American working classes.

Out of Touch

Peter Hitchens chooses not to see these things, but clings to his arrogant, filtered view of things. It is clear from his comments that he does not know what is going on in the world. He says on his spat with UPSU: “This is what is coming. It begins like this, and it ends with arrests of dissidents at four in the morning, conducted by people who are quite sure that what they are doing is right.”
These things are happening now! Tommy Robinson is not the only casualty of fascist weaponizing of the law against dissenters. It has been happening to hundreds of ordinary folk who mis-gender people or who express ‘wrong think’ or who have decried Islam. Police have already been turning up to snatch free thinking people from their homes.

Nail in the Coffin

A cross party group of MPs is drawing up legislation to make criticism of Islam a crime. With this, it can confidently be assumed that Free Speech is dead in the UK and where are the elitist media?
In his criticism of Tommy Robinson he refers to a “very well researched article” by one of his Mail colleagues. The article is full of pejorative terms that detract from any hope of objective reporting. Peter Hitchens aligns himself with bilge like this. He is an enjoyable person to listen to and has a lot to say, but there is no substance to his words.

Peter Hitchens has allowed himself to become as much Fake News as the others in his Oxford intellectuals.

Journalism is in the sewer as many reporters live in different circles to the rest of us. Peter Hitchens should be in the vanguard to restore trust and truth, but instead wallows in the mud of deceit like the rest of his cohort. Why should anybody follow him or any other elitist?]]>

Move to Murder

TOMMY ROBINSON SENT TO UNOFFICIAL DEATH ROW

I discovered on 14th June 2018, that journalist and campaigner, Tommy Robinson, had been moved to HMP Leicester with a Muslim population of over 70%. Already, death threats were  made against him and, apparently his first night spent there was one with prisoners banging constantly, baying for his harm. This transfer was on the authority of the new Home Secretary, Sajid Javid, ironically a Muslim minister in Theresa May’s cabinet. I should point out that Mrs. May has always been involved in the persecution of Tommy Robinson which seemed to coincide with when she was originally appointed as Home Secretary.
Tommy Robinson is a political prisoner and has been incarcerated at the pleasure of the UK Government. Indications are they want him dead, but dare not do it by blatantly assigning a state employee to carry out the execution, so they go for the cowardly option of putting him amongst groups who desperately want to kill him as part of their Jihad against dissent towards Allah and Mohammed and his open objection to the state’s covering up of child rape while displaying reluctance to bring those responsible to justice.

An Informal Death Sentence

Tommy Robinson’s transfer is a death sentence awaiting an executioner just as it was for Kevin Crehan, the non-violent, bacon-on-mosque ‘attacker’ who lasted just six months before his murder on 27th December 2016.
Kevin Crehan
To further illustrate his peril, Britain First leader, Paul Golding, was assaulted in prison in March 2018 at HMP Elmley, again by Muslim inmates.  The risks to those whom the establishment labels as ‘Far Right’ are well known, so the UK Government, with its obligation of exercising a ‘Duty of Care’, in reality seem not to care about the safety of political prisoners.

Myth of the Far Right

It seems to be a state sanctioned label to call anyone you do not like or who calls out the corruption within the system as ‘Far Right’. This is used in nearly all media statements and is a derogatory association that is never properly explained.
I have made contact with actual Far Right people to learn about their opinion of Tommy Robinson. They do not like him and claim that he is too Jew friendly.
The blatant disregard for basic human rights afforded to Kevin Crehan and Paul Golding is almost on a par with the Soviet and North Korean gulags. It is also a path that the UK Government is wilfully choosing to follow. They are using or, perhaps more accurately, misusing laws designed to control actual terrorists and highly subjective hate speech laws to silence mouth-pieces that try to point out the truth. They also seem happy to allow communist thugs to threaten and attack controversial political figures with impunity.
Tommy Robinson was focussing on the mass abuse by Pakistani and Muslim grooming gangs, but I have found that the paedophile issue goes even farther than them.

The Cancerous Web of Paedophilia

I am always reluctant to adopt a conspiracy theory position but, from other sources, there appears to exist, a sinister culture of child sexual slavery and exploitation that runs through the British establishment like a cancerous web. It is at every level of society and involves quite powerful and influential people within the Government, the police and the media. If only to exemplify this, it is worth watching the revelations of whistleblower and ex-CID police officer at Scotland Yard, John Wedger. He joins a list of courageous people who have risked life and everything to speak out. What part the paedo-monsters have to play in affecting the decision making process of the immoral and spineless Prime Minister May we are not privy to know. However, what is clear is that they are content to endanger the life of working class hero, Tommy Robinson, without fear of consequence.

Call to the Office of Cabinet Minister Penny Mordaunt

Penny Mordaunt1Deeply concerned with not just Tommy Robinson’s safety, but also possible implications of what will happen should he come to harm, I phoned my MP’s office (Rt Hon Penny Mordaunt MP) as soon as I learned of his transfer to a dangerous prison. I told them that her letter in reply to an earlier letter I had sent, concerning his initial incarceration, was almost identical to that of another complainant who had contacted his MP in Winchester. It suggested a standardized response.

I explained (and was assured that my message would be passed on) that I attended Free Speech and Tommy Robinson rallies, not simply to lend support, but also to find out what sort of people went to these events.
[wpvideo Vm1mgZ0k]
I have been unable to find any so-called Far Right people. I urged that this pejorative term be remove from reports as it was not what attendees are and is only inflaming resentment.
The ones I met at these rallies I shadowed, observed, listened to and engaged with. They were ordinary, working class people who care deeply about free speech and their children. They came to join with others; to listen to speakers and to express their dissatisfaction with the failure to act to protect children. No one is talking to them except people like Tommy Robinson. To simply dismiss them as Far Right is a grave mistake.
Opponents of Tommy Robinson have been challenged to find anything racist that he has said. They have failed.
Right now, the government and the UK establishment have lost legitimacy. His former criminal charges and convictions are being regarded as illegitimate and politically motivated. People are defiant and angry. Meanwhile the Government sets about targeting vulnerable individuals with bogus hate speech crimes. The main reason they maintain power is because the complicit media are stifling truth and reality. This situation is a powder keg.
Taking Tommy Robinson was done while he was alone. That itself was cowardly. To place him on death row surrounded by malevolent inmates is throwing him to the lions. It is an utter disgrace; an insult to what it means to be British and an embarrassment in the eyes of the world. Tommy Robinson is a political prisoner of the UK Government; a dangerously corrupt and incompetent regime that is dragging us toward civil war and, by so doing committing acts of treason against the British people.

James Williams mashes Nigel Farage over his criticism of Tommy Robinson

James Williams mashes Nigel Farage Chimes Media founder, James Williams, mashes Nigel Farage over the latter’s criticism of Tommy Robinson. Working class hero, Tommy Robinson who stands up for the forgotten and ignored. Tommy Robinson speaks out against the malevolence and intent of Islam while Nigel Farage avoids even saying the word “Islam”.

Libertarian Support Tommy Robinson

Many of the people supporting Tommy Robinson are libertarians, not Far Rightist. Standing against the people are the political classes; the legal establishment and the media. Mr. Farage sides with them. He displays his class prejudice by attacking Tommy Robinson. By calling Tommy Robinson stupid and not very bright he decries those who look to Tommy Robinson as their voice. Nigel Farage should be standing shoulder to shoulder with Tommy Robinson to defend free speech. Nigel Farage should also be more prominent in condemning the wide-scale harm being done to our children and the Islamification of Britain. [wpvideo 1fdJAnNN]]]>

Helen Dale

Helen Dale – Writer for The Spectator  Helen Dale, known for a time by her pen name Helen Demidenko, is an Australian writer and lawyer. She served as a senior adviser to David Leyonhjelm, a Liberal Democrat member of the Australian Senate, from 2014 through to the election in 2016. In the 13 years of Labour Government (1997-2010) more laws were passed than in over 900 years (1066-1997). The legislation that is being used by the current Conservative Government was brought in by Labour. Section 127 of the Communications Act needs to be repealed.

HELEN DALE SPEAKS OUT IN DEFENCE OF COMEDY AND FREE SPEECH

  [wpvideo m6CpF7aR]]]>

FREE SPEECH DEMO SEES PASSIONATE CONDEMNATION OF UK & SCOTTISH GOVERNMENTS FOR AUTHORITARIAN ATTACKS ON LIBERTY

The Bagpipe March for Free Speech   A good natured but passionate demonstration took place Monday 23rd April 2018 to protest about the threat to humour and free speech. This video is filled with inspiring bagpipe music which uplifts the spirit and made it a joy to participate in. About protesters gathered in Leicester Square and marched on Downing Street to melodious bagpipe tunes. There was a friendly liaison with police, but the protesters  conveyed a strength of feeling about the UK political and legal establishment penalizing comedy and attacking those they think have committed hate speech. Many bystanders voiced their support along the route. VIDEO 3 [wpvideo Je6knhIi]


INITIAL REPORT AFTER DEMO

I was the first to arrive at Leicester Square. I got there just before 11am on 23rd April 2018. It was a sunny but with a thin veil of cloudy patches and a chill wind, just to enough to take away the desire to strip and absorb the sun’s rays. Although, these days, I feel the threat of contracting skin cancer has been a sufficient deterrent for some years now. People started to show up from about 1115 onwards and it was a very friendly atmosphere. I heard from a police officer that Mark Meechan (Count Dankula) had been fined £800. Milling among the various gatherings I was struck by the passion that seemed to ooze from the attendees, but it was not mindless passion, but a grouping of people who had thought thing s out and who had decided that our society is under serious threat from radical authoritarians who are intent on turning us all into a passive automatons , fearful to think anything let alone say anything. I overheard one young man, probably not a day over 20 years, tell of how he had suffered abuse from a young woman who made derogatory remarks about his sexual organs after he had turned her down for a date. There were stories abounding of how a young woman had said the ‘wrong thing’ on Twitter and been booted off the platform. I heard word that a regular attendee to Speaker’s Corner, Tam, a Malaysian student had gone to Paris for a filming with Tommy Robinson, but had been refused entry back into the UK. He had had a clash with London Mayor Sadiq Khan a few days earlier. In the event he had had the microphone taken off him by officials and then evicted. There was a lot of friendly exchange with the police attending and not a hint of any trouble. I reckon numbers attending were probably about 500 in number. Perhaps one of the biggest cheers that went up when Karl Benjamin arrived. Karl is perhaps better known by his online pseudonym, Sargon of Akkad. He has many hundreds of thousands of fans worldwide and something of a global star. There was appropriately, as it was a pro-Count Dankula march. a bagpipe player whose very accomplished talents played some classic Scottish melodies that went down well with the whole crowd. At 1300 we began the march from Leicester Square through Trafalgar Square and to Richmond Terrace across the road from Downing Street. I had been provided with a blue T-shirt with the slogans:     [gallery ids="9395,9396" type="rectangular"]   Along the way a number of bystanders took photographed and I was asked by several of them what it was all about. There was a heavy police presence, but throughout relations were cordial and, at times, jovial. There was ton of footage taken. Too much for it all to be processed, but one of the important things is to meet with others and establish links and friendships. At Richmond Terrace several people took into in turns to speak with a handful of nominated ones such as Karl Benjamin being among them and a well spoken reporter from The Spectator who was non-too-pleased with the Conservative Party administration over the whole free speech affair. There will be a selection of clips published here once I have had time to go through the footage. In the aftermath of the march, the organizers, from a group identifying as Liberalists UK, had booked up a session at a floating pub called the Tattershall Castle on the Thames.

DEMO GATHERING

VIDEO 2   [wpvideo bVsfVb6G] While Mark Meechan was receiving his sentence in Scotland, a demonstration, organized by Liberalists UK was underway in London. This is the second film on the event by Chimes Media and is about the gathering – Bag pipes, You Tube star Sargon of Akkad and the humour of being silenced. Fun as well as serious. No trouble; no arrests; good relations with the police.

Pre-departure to Free Speech march in London

VIDEO 1   [wpvideo y7i9fhjm]]]>

Zuckerberg Fry Up Courtesy of Ted Cruz

COMMENT Mark Zuckerberg admits that Silicon Valley is very Left leaning. He has up to 15,000 employed to control inappropriate content, but claims to know nothing about their political allegiances.  He cannot explain why several pro-conservative and Catholic pages have been sanctioned and removed but no Leftist content.  In the senate hearing, Mr. Zuckerberg is made uncomfortable by Senator Cruz’s powerful assertions backed up by examples, but the conclusion can only be that Zuckerberg acts as a demigod and allows censorship of material that he and his employees feel are not in line with their own political views. It is disturbingly fascistic in the way that the company operates. It clearly does not obey its own rules. Facebook needs to be sanctioned heavily for 1st Amendment violations of other content users. Zuckerberg is either an incompetent CEO or a blatant liar. The situation cannot go unpunished as the implications are very serious and other tech giants need to know the limitations of their power. James Williams Please support this site either by making a donation or even better by become a Patreon.  www.patreon.com/chimesmedia Patreon’s are special people. If it were not for their foresight and generosity, William Shakespeare would probably not have written any of his plays and Ernest Shackleton would not have been able to carry out his famous sorties to Antarctica. So, as a Patreon you never know how your generosity will change the world. [simple-payment id=”741″] [simple-payment id=”882″] [contact-form][contact-field label=”Name” type=”name” required=”1″ /][contact-field label=”Email” type=”email” required=”1″ /][contact-field label=”Website” type=”url” /][contact-field label=”Comment” type=”textarea” required=”1″ /][/contact-form]]]>