Amidst the climate alarmism that is sometimes misplaced, there are stories that paint a different picture.
Why are we only getting the ‘bad news’ stories about the climate all the time? Is it politically convenient? Does it fit narratives? Is it always true? Are we only being told one side? Are we meant to remain in fear?
Thanks to China and India, human-induced ‘greening’ has increased by 5% across the Earth!
A published in the American Meteorological Society’s Journal of Climate showed that climate models exaggerate global warming from CO2 emissions by as much as 45%.
Another study in the journal Nature Geoscience confirmed that climate models were faulty. As one of the authors put it, “We haven’t seen that rapid acceleration in warming after 2000 that we see in the models.”
Findings fromthe University of Alabama-Huntsville showed that the Earth’s atmosphere appears to be less sensitive to changing CO2 levels than previously assumed.
According to data collected by the US federal government, polar bears along the entire west coast of Baffin Island are ‘stable.’ On the south-eastern side of the island (around the Nunavut capital of Iqaluit) polar bears have even experienced a ‘likely increase.’ It is only on the island’s north-eastern corner — in a management area that meets Greenland — that polar bears are suspected to be in decline.
From the topic of this article, our world is literally a greener place than it was 20 years ago to data from NASA satellites with the cause being accredited to human-induced activity in China and India.
The point highlighted here is what we hear in the media is typically only one side of the picture which does not give an accurate representation of what is going on. For years now, Collective-Evolution has been reporting on environmental issues from a grounded perspective.
Looking at data, looking beyond the politics and simply at what’s happening. This approach shows you things are troubling in certain areas like pollution, air quality, EMF exposure and so forth, but the number one climate story we always hear about, C02 warming the atmosphere, simply does not hold water from the perspectives of many scientists and it hasn’t for the 10 years we have been reporting on it.
I (Joe Martino) recall a conversation I had with Gregg Braden where we were discussing research about the climate and what the data is TRULY showing. Amidst all the C02 alarmism I asked “Gregg… it appears to me that it’s more likely we’re headed into a global cooling period than a warming period.” He responded with “that’s precisely what the data shows, and it appears humanity is suffering from amnesia when it comes to the cycles of climate.”
The bottom line is, the majority don’t know the truth and the news is actually a lot better than what we’re being told. The challenge is, it’s more beneficial for power structures and business to keep us in fear.
This is an extract from Black Label Logic on the Red-Blue pill theory regarding gender relations.: When I wrote the blue and red pill theoretical framework the goal was to identify the mutual exclusivity of the two frameworks. I deliberately left out the purple pill, as it requires its own essay due to the fact that it appears to contradict the mutual exclusivity that was outlined in the other essay. To define the purple pill, it is a position that seeks to enable a man to have the blue pill fantasy, while remaining red pill. In essence leveraging his red pill knowledge in order to experience the blue pill fantasy.In a sense, once a man learns red pill knowledge, it is impossible to return to the Matrix without significant dissonance, unlike Cypher, there is simply no way to have your mind wiped clean of all aspects of the red pill. It may be suppressed for a time, or channeled through a defense mechanism or two, but the idealism that is required for a true blue pill fantasy is gone and what remains is merely a hollow shell.Central to the blue pill fantasy is the idea of there being a “one“, a perfect partner who fulfills your every need. Leaving out the part where perfection is a human conception that has no place in reality, and if it did would at best exist in a moment by moment basis, there is no such thing as a perfect partner. Someone may be a better fit for you than another, in transient moments it may feel as they are perfect but this is an illusion. A man cannot at the same time accept AWALT and view his partner in the manner required for the blue pill.From my research on the topic, the reasoning behind a purple pill perspective is to attempt a circumnavigation of the principles that are core to the red pill, such s solipsism, hypergamy and “all women are like that“. It is also based in an illusion of control, through which if the husband is red pill enough, he can alter her biological firmware, through constant vigilance. Throughout history, female nature was socially controlled through various means, religion, social shaming and jurisprudence are some of them. For instance, British divorce law from pre-1900 where the husband would automatically gain custody over the children in the event of divorce played on a female being attached to her children to reduce branch swinging, and to police her behavior.Nathaniel Hawthorne’s “The Scarlet Letter“, demonstrates how social shaming and shunning could be utilized to reduce the tendency for hypergamy, through it having social and financial consequences. The severe biblical punishments for adultery served to further reduce the inherent tendencies of the human female.The purple pill perspective is therefore, that a man standing alone as long as he is alpha and red pill aware enough can be different from the myriad of other men who were unable to accomplish what an entire society creates incentives against. To make this essay comparable with the other essay, I will go through the purple pill perspective on each point from it.
Mid February 2019 witnessed nine Labour MPs resigning the Labour Party with eight of them joining with three Conservative MPs to form the Independent Group. The group has formed in opposition to the Labour and Conservative parties’ stance on Brexit. The one Labour MP who declined to join this group was apparently supportive of leaving the EU.
It is interesting that this should happen within about 6 weeks of the Brexit leaving date of 29th March 2019. However, there was another, very important reason for all nine (with possibly more on the way) leaving the Labour Party and that was due to the prevalence of persistent Anti-Semitism in Labour that has arisen since Jeremy Corbyn took over the leadership.
Now, I have some sympathies for Jeremy Corbyn in this regard because I do not believe that what has happened was of his making, but rather due as a consequence of the give-away cost of joining the Labour Party before he became leader.
The Video: Quitters
Rise of Anti-Semitism in the Labour Party
The dropping of Labour Party membership to £2 (currently £3) for young people and students encouraged a surge in intake and swelled Labour’s card carrying members to over 500,000.
However, ideology and tolerance were never qualifying factors for getting signed up. It was just a policy of “come in and be one of us. Join our growing army and take back control of our country. Socialism is the way forward.”
Jeremy Corbyn, with this fresh intake was propelled from being a mere backbencher into becoming the iconic symbol of socialism in Britain and potential its Prime Minister.
The presence of anti-Semitism within the Labour Party is an ugly carbuncle that will not go away because these types are now entrenched within the Party and have the weight of numbers on their side. Many of its young and new members are Muslim and many others associate with the Far Left Momentum Group which boasts to have 40,000 of those members. That is an army with a significant number of anti-Semites in their ranks. The anti-Semitism seems to have two fold basis; one is a fundamental hatred of Jews and the other is vehement opposition to the existence of the Jewish state of Israel.
The Devil’s Prongs – Islam and Socialism
Meaning of Politics
Politics is about the relational dynamics of the individual (the fundamental unit) with the collective (the state/ community). Simplistically, Rightism is pro-individualism and the supremacy and freedom of the individual. Leftism is pro-state and for extending its power with individual freedom being subordinate.
Islam and Socialism
The word “Islamaphobia” is an invented word to enslave the weak minded and suppress dissident voices and apostates. It is a term being used to gag and persecute those who object to an extreme authoritarian ideology colonizing state after state and compelling individuals within those states to kneel to Allah and his Prophet.
Both Islam and Socialism require the power of the state to enforce the policies and rules as is deemed fit. Both are authoritarian in nature. It is thus hardly surprising that Islam should find open ears and minds to its puritanical orthodoxy among hard-line socialists. Both use identitarianism to discriminate between who benefits and who suffers. With socialism it is about the oppressed versus the oppressor and with Islam it is Muslims versus Kaffirs.
Historically, it has been estimated that over 200 million people died in India alone due to the brutality of Islamic regimes. The barbarism and enslavement of captured came with a high death toll in most places. In Africa 120 million died. Black boys often suffered penectomy and castration and bled to death in agony. Jews, Christians, Hindus, Buddhists and Pagans were slaughtered in their millions. One million white slaves were taken from Europe. From the trail of bones found by explorers, it seems there was only a one in five chance of making it to the slave ships that carried black people off to the Americas.
The experiment with socialism in the 20th Century witnessed the barbaric destruction of an estimated 170 million lives. The numbers can only be estimated because many just disappeared. In every country it has been tried, Socialism has brought economic ruin, oppression and death.
Nazis Find an Ideological Home
The National Socialists of the 20th Century were fundamentally socialist with doctrines that aligned to Marxist thinking. It was always a creature of the Left in spite of the false spin that is presented to the credulous masses. Many National Socialists expressed a disdain for capitalism. As with other forms of socialism, National Socialism used the power of the state to enforce its will and to exert social control over all citizens and institutions.
In National Socialism: National is the adjective; Socialism is the noun.
Clash of Utopias
With dynamic forces causing serious rifts due to conflicts over Brexit and a significant number of its members who possess a natural hatred of Jews and the existence of Israel, the Labour Party is on the point of splitting irreparably.
The peril that Europe currently faces with mass immigration has allowed a virtual invasion force of millions of Muslims to move onto European soil to stay. The process is called Hijra and is about spreading the doctrine of Islam through migration and out-breeding native populations until a Global Caliphate is established. In the case of Socialism it is about establishing a Socialist Utopia.
Utopias are like Gods. They provide promise of the ideal society for their disciples, but the socialist utopia is not the global caliphate. They cannot live side by side. One may stand but only at the cost of the other. Whatever may come, it promises massive suffering and many more disappeared people, not just in the tens of millions but probably far worse. It is a very bleak prospect for all and should be resisted, but with the pathetically weak leadership that exists it is looking more and more like a lost game.]]>
Live Views of Earth
The International Space Station (ISS) is a space station, or a habitable artificial satellite, in low Earth orbit. Its first component was launched into orbit in 1998, with the first long-term residents arriving in November 2000. It has been inhabited continuously since that date. The last pressurised module was fitted in 2011, and an experimental inflatable space habitat was added in 2016. The station is expected to operate until 2030. Development and assembly of the station continues, with several new elements scheduled for launch in 2019. The ISS is the largest human-made body in low Earth orbit and can often be seen with the naked eye from Earth. The ISS consists of pressurised habitation modules, structural trusses, solar arrays, radiators, docking ports, experiment bays and robotic arms. ISS components have been launched by Russian Proton and Soyuzrockets and American Space Shuttles.
The ISS serves as a microgravity and space environment research laboratory in which crew members conduct experiments in biology, human biology, physics, astronomy, meteorology, and other fields. The station is suited for the testing of spacecraft systems and equipment required for missions to the Moon and Mars. The ISS maintains an orbit with an altitude of between 330 and 435 km (205 and 270 mi) by means of reboost manoeuvres using the engines of the Zvezda module or visiting spacecraft. It circles the Earth in roughly 92 minutes and completes 15.5 orbits per day.
The ISS programme is a joint project between five participating space agencies: NASA (United States), Roscosmos (Russia), JAXA (Japan), ESA (Europe), and CSA (Canada). The ownership and use of the space station is established by intergovernmental treaties and agreements. The station is divided into two sections, the Russian Orbital Segment (ROS) and the United States Orbital Segment (USOS), which is shared by many nations. As of January 2018, operations of the American segment were funded until 2025. Roscosmos has endorsed the continued operation of ISS through 2024, but has proposed using elements of the Russian segment to construct a new Russian space station called OPSEK. In December 2018, the U.S. Senate extended ISS funding until 2030.
The ISS is the ninth space station to be inhabited by crews, following the Soviet and later Russian Salyut, Almaz, and Mirstations as well as Skylab from the US. The station has been continuously occupied for 18 years and 111 days since the arrival of Expedition 1 on 2 November 2000. This is the longest continuous human presence in low Earth orbit, having surpassed the previous record of 9 years and 357 days held by Mir. It has been visited by astronauts, cosmonauts and space tourists from 18 different nations. After the American Space Shuttle programme ended in 2011, Soyuz rockets became the only provider of transport for astronauts at the ISS.
The station is serviced by a variety of visiting spacecraft: the Russian Soyuz and Progress, the American Dragon and Cygnus, the Japanese H-II Transfer Vehicle, and formerly the American Space Shuttle and the European Automated Transfer Vehicle. The Dragon spacecraft allows the return of pressurised cargo to Earth (downmass), which is used for example to repatriate scientific experiments for further analysis. The Soyuz return capsule has minimal downmass capability next to the astronauts.]]>
Sunday Mail columnist and author, Peter Hitchens was barred from giving a speech at Portsmouth University on Tuesday 12th February 2019.
He had been prepared to make the two hour journey to Portsmouth at his own expense and not even charge a fee. However, the snowflakes of the LGBT+ community at the university decided that he had made unacceptable comments in the past about LGBT matters and, as they had just completed their pride month to celebrate themselves, his presence would not be appreciated.
Attack on Free Speech
They did not tell him specifically that he had been barred, but that his event had been ‘delayed’; i.e. postponed.
In Peter Hitchens’ eloquent words: “…the truth is that they stopped the event because they don’t like my opinions. That proves they cannot be trusted with freedom of speech. They came up with one pretext for policing thought and imposing censorship this time. They are equally capable of coming up with another, whenever required.”
As he pointed out to Eden Ladley, the LGBT+ officer for the Portsmouth Students Union (UPSU), the delay was a human decision, not one brought on by physical barriers such as structural failure in the building.
He went on to say: “I suspect that many students have far too few chances to hear views that are different from the standard-issue conformist Leftism that is their normal diet.What upsets me about this ban is that it is a general menace to freedom of speech, thought and assembly.”
There were two petitions over whether Peter Hitchens should attend. 129 said he should not and 55 said he should. This is out of a student population of 23,000 which means only 0.8% participation and I am fairly sure that the vast majority of the students were never consulted.
I am wholly in agreement with Peter Hitchens. He is a superb and entertaining speaker who loves debate. It is a huge loss to those students who are still free thinkers, but Leftist ideologues always act as though they have the authority to speak for all when they have no such mandate. It belies their authoritarian conviction in their own self-righteousness an is indicative of a pernicious form of narcissism.
I have many issues with Peter Hitchens, but free speech is not one of them. Free speech is about the right to risk offence. It is not hate speech even though some may think it is. From UPSU’s comments on the subject, they clearly do not understand the concept.
Peter Hitchens – another Fake News Journalist
I used to be a huge fan of Peter Hitchen, but he has long since fallen off the pedestal that I once placed him on.
I found that his opinionated views on President Trump and Tommy Robinson (Stephen Yaxley-Lennon) along with his failure to highlight the massive problem with high level incompetence and criminal activities, which are bringing western countries to their knees, smack of being complicit to the gross treason of leaders to towards the people they are supposed to represent.
Peter Hitchens arrogantly proclaims that people can either follow him or Tommy Robinson and condemns those who would choose the latter. Personally, I am not impressed with mandatory directives. It is the likes of Tommy Robinson who have brought the subject of mass violence inflicted on children in the UK to the fore. He was the one who stood against the abuse that our soldiers endured on their return from campaigns abroad. He did so in the face of cynical criticism from the media. Peter Hitchens, as with the rest of the privileged clan of journalists, says nothing and offers nothing. All he does is sneer at the messenger of the inferior social class.
Peter Hitchens is not the one picking up the pieces of their lives after their teenage son has been run down by an Islamic thug. Tommy Robinson is boots on the ground and reporting it.
Peter Hitchens’ has proven to be unreliable as an ally as highlighted by James Delingpole (Breitbart). He has been bewilderingly two-faced on Brexit – showing glowing happiness that people voted for it and then criticising the outcome.
I am drawn to the conclusion that Peter Hitchens is an Oxbridge post-graduate snob. In spite of his seemingly controversial views, he belongs to an intellectual elite that look down their noses at the rest of us. He thinks he knows more than he does, but is detached from the sufferings of ordinary people.
To his class, people like Donald Trump and Stephen Yaxley-Lennon are regarded as impudent and vulgar upstarts that should have no place in the corridors of power. The fact that the reason why we are in such a mess today, with white girls being molested on an industrial scale, is because elitist snobs like Peter Hitchens, say nothing and do nothing.
One invective against Trump becoming President was that he was not qualified (as if you had to have some sort of certificate). By claiming this he implies that Hillary Clinton would be better. His obliviousness of her many high level crimes is plain to see as might be the case for those who live closeted lives. The thousands of deaths (including multiple murders) that lay squarely at Clinton’s door would make the Emperor Caligula look like a traffic warden by comparison. Trump has something like 75 structures erected across the globe. That took a lot of negotiating and a lot of understanding of foreign countries. May be that is why he got the red carpet treatment when he went to China (unlike Obama)? Trump has been bringing the prospect of real peace in Korea. He has enriched and seriously helped the American working classes.
Peter Hitchens chooses not to see these things, but clings to his arrogant, filtered view of things. It is clear from his comments that he does not know what is going on in the world. He says on his spat with UPSU: “This is what is coming. It begins like this, and it ends with arrests of dissidents at four in the morning, conducted by people who are quite sure that what they are doing is right.”
These things are happening now! Tommy Robinson is not the only casualty of fascist weaponizing of the law against dissenters. It has been happening to hundreds of ordinary folk who mis-gender people or who express ‘wrong think’ or who have decried Islam. Police have already been turning up to snatch free thinking people from their homes.
Nail in the Coffin
A cross party group of MPs is drawing up legislation to make criticism of Islam a crime. With this, it can confidently be assumed that Free Speech is dead in the UK and where are the elitist media?
In his criticism of Tommy Robinson he refers to a “very well researched article” by one of his Mail colleagues. The article is full of pejorative terms that detract from any hope of objective reporting. Peter Hitchens aligns himself with bilge like this. He is an enjoyable person to listen to and has a lot to say, but there is no substance to his words.
Peter Hitchens has allowed himself to become as much Fake News as the others in his Oxford intellectuals.
Journalism is in the sewer as many reporters live in different circles to the rest of us. Peter Hitchens should be in the vanguard to restore trust and truth, but instead wallows in the mud of deceit like the rest of his cohort. Why should anybody follow him or any other elitist?]]>
There are few more putrid sects in the world today than those from the cult of radicalized feminism. The amount of resources they dupe from sympathetic individuals and public finances runs into hundreds of millions of pounds/ dollars. Those that fact check their exaggerated claims about women’s suffering often do so, not to help those women, but to fill their coffers with the ‘gold’ of the gullible (which is usually somebody else’s money) and to promote their career and status as virtuous saints of the modern age.
Men vs Women Confrontation
Nasty women do not know how to scale down their own aggression when on the attack. They seem to lack a mental gauge that should tell them when to stop or to drop the subject of their angst. I have witnessed vile language coming from women in the streets who cannot help to denigrate a man in public.
It is an Achilles heel for many men when they have to deal with a malevolent, confrontational, demanding or banshee woman. They often really do not know what to do or how to cope with the threat. Men will either (1) walk away, (2) absorb the vitriol or (3) turn to aggression.
Men are forced to choose one of the three options due to their ineptitude in resolving disputes with women. They feel that whatever tactics they deploy almost invariably ends up bad for them or for some other innocent guy who stands in the way of the bullet.
Men Need Good Women
Usually men do not choose to become aggressive in public because they know it would invite a world of trouble for them. Members of the public tend to be total hypocrites in male-female disputes. They will refuse to intervene when a man is “getting it in the neck” i.e. subject to abuse. However, should he lay a hand on her, they are right there transmitting how narcissistically virtuous they are by defending women regardless of how obnoxious she may be.
Ironically, it is in this regard, that men need women most. Men need level headed conservative type women to protect them from the aggression of a vicious female. In fact social experiments show that it is usually only women who will intervene to defend a man from abuse. Now when I say ‘conservative’, I am not referring to politics. I mean women who respect men and women for the characters that they are rather than the identity group they belong to. These women do not have to be any relationship with the man but, just as a kindly stranger may help someone in need of rescue, so a man being raked over the coals needs another woman to help him.
There are such women and they can be of any age or social group, but they are like gold dust. They are the truly virtuous ones because they apply decent principles to their actions and tend to understand the dilemma of men who are under attack from women.
Women who defend men should always be treasured and treated with the utmost respect. Many of them will have their brothers, fathers, husbands or boyfriends and some may have sons. However, they know that the dynamics and power of inter-sex relations lies with women and not with men. Many will have been brought up and have learned how males think and act from an early age. They will have seen real prejudice is inflicted on their beloved male associates while the victim-claiming women use feminist doctrines to fleece the system and men of money, assets and especially their children. Feminists are parasites who spread their poison for personal gain and good women know it that is why the vast majority of women refute feminism. Feminism has become anchored to the sentiments of hatred of the male and a lust for the material resources that men provide (most commonly through taxation).
The feminist harpies of politics, education and law are plentiful. They have real power to affect the lives of women, men and especially children for good or bad. However, the modern feminist has two prime aims. The first one is for self gratification and the second is promoting their cause i.e. spreading their poison. Both aims feed their own toxic narcissism.
They have no real concern for the interest of women; that is a pretence that is used to garnish resources from the unsuspecting and the gullible.
When in positions that decide the fate of others, they tend to have a predetermined (prejudicial) view of how they believe things should be and then try to force reality to conform to their way of thinking. This is what feminist prejudice is. The toxicity of feminist poison seeps into all areas and will often be practiced by those who do not consider themselves feminists. It is why men are at a disadvantage when it comes to determining child custody arrangements. Feminism couples with the internalized thinking that women should be protected and males punished and is why males on trial tend to get harsher sentences.
Feminism is full of contradictions and has many damaging logical arguments against it, but the feminist counter is to simply dismiss objectivity as being patriarchal, misogynistic and immoral.
From my research, I have found that 5% of women have sociopathic tendencies; 0.5% are psychopathic and probably about 20% more carry some form of psychotic condition.
Men-Going-Their-Own-Way (MGTOW) individuals long ago declared they want as little to do with women as possible. But, this is condemning good and bad women alike when what should be encouraged is engaging and helping the good women to flourish. Malevolent women need to be called out and shamed for their wickedness, but men need good women to do it.
Screen out Feminists
There is a desperate need to screen out feminist cultists since they are causing lifelong harm to children and fostering hatred to be a more dominant emotion than love for young adults. Men are useless at combating this negativism. By contrast, truly good and virtuous women shine in the lives of all who care and especially children.
For men trying to date women, you have to be blunt and direct. Do not waste time on feminists. They will suck resources out of you and chuck you when they have no further need for you. If a woman is authoritarian – chuck her. If a woman declares herself a feminist – chuck her. If she is neurotic and self centred – chuck her. If she expects you to pay for everything –chuck her. If you are in a long line of former boyfriends – chuck her. If she is a pathological liar – chuck her. If she does not make time for you –chuck her.
Basically, you should ask her about herself. Be blunt and ask her. If she is offended, so-be-it; you will know something already. It’s best to get things straight from the start rather than let a monster screw your life up and kill your heart. If you leave things you will get too deeply in and find yourself forking out just to keep the relationship going. The longer you leave it, the more painful the split.
On the other hand, if you have a girl who is cool then hold onto her and pay her due respect.
If she turns out to be an angel, then paradise is just around the corner.
Get with the right woman and life is peachy.
There are two types of women:
Bitches – keep away from these. They will bleed you dry and destroy your life.
Ladies – these are warm and caring and are worthy of respect, care and protecting.
The right woman and the right man are complimentary to each other and together can create some great kids for a better future, not just for that couple, but for many others.]]>
In Big Tech, internet services provided by mega companies like Google and Apple have led to many people becoming dependent on them in a variety of ways. They enable people to showcase creative content; to run businesses and to exchange personal messages. However, as the saying goes “Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely” and so it is that the assault on free speech and the shutting down of alternative views is well underway. Many hundreds have found themselves being demonetized, de-platformed and even banned for simply saying the wrong thing or holding the wrong views. In London alone, people have been arrested and charged with the offence of “Hate Speech” because they said the wrong thing. It makes you wonder if any of those executing these policies have read any history books or George Orwell. Worryingly, it is not just the wroth of censorship that wrong-thinkers are having to cope with. I will call them “Dissidents” because that is effectively what they are. Dissidents can now find themselves ‘hunted down’, doxed (having personal details published for all to see); their children risk being removed from their care. They can also their jobs and be declined employment. The concept of free speech is hanging by a thread and even those who never publish a word on the internet, find themselves fearful of expressing their views to colleagues, friends and family in case there are repercussions from word of their hate-think being found out.
A hurricane lantern does not just emit good light, it is also a rudimentary provider of heat. It is safer than candles since the flame is enclosed. It is light and easy to use and you can adjust the wick to increase or decrease luminosity. The point of it is that it is largely independent of centrally controlled power and heat.
I eventually found what I was looking for on Ebay for a price of just £7.39 (which included shipping costs). The problem came when I tried to pay for it.
My trusty Barclay’s Debit card was rejected with no explanation given. A polite Ebay helper phoned me up, but was unable to resolve the problem. He suggested that I contact my bank, but revealed that Pay Pal processed card payments, even though I had deliberately avoided using Pay Pal on the payment options.
A few weeks earlier I had cancelled my Pay Pal account and told them that I did not agree with their policy of compelling censorship of individuals that did not meet their version of ethical standards i.e. having non-left-wing views. To me financial organizations should not indulge in political sanctioning. To do so, smacks of real fascism and is extremely sinister for me, especially since I was brought up in a household that had been intimately affected by two world wars.
There are moves afoot to turn our society into a cashless one where payments will be made through bank transactions, phone apps and cards. That is now, but it does not stop there because already the use of microchip technology has been introduced to workers in Sweden. Some workers have already agreed to having a rice-grain sized micro-chip planted in the web of skin between forefinger and thumb. It allows them access through certain doors and can be used to operate cars. How wonderfully convenient for consumers and workers! However, it is also wonderfully convenient for unscrupulous control by totalitarians who can turn off your access to resources on the whims of their desires. Dissident tongues in China are already suffering due to Government controlled sanctions provided by Google-type technology, and that is without any implants. It does not take a genius to work out where this leads to.
We are tracked every second of every day. While most people are harmless sheeple they are only regarded as such if they conform. Make an error of judgement such as overstay your time in a parking bay or mutter some ‘hate speech’ phrase under your breath and expect to suffer the oppression of a weaponized legal system brought to bear.
You do not even have to have done anything wrong. By existing as a white male, you can find yourself marginalized by an increasingly corrupt anti-human system with its army of humanoid bots. The hostility that is being fostered against this sexual and racial group has disturbing similarities to what the Jews in Nazi Germany faced.
White males are being denigrated as being privileged (even those born poor and raised by a single mother in the backstreets of Sheffield). This blatant policy of racial and gender hatred is being driven by an extremely pernicious group of actual privileged and bigoted people who have wormed their way into positions of influence and power in government and industry. It means the poor white boy from Sheffield can expect to be denied what few opportunities may have been available. He can expect to be skipped over in job applications or made to stand at the back of the queue if he needs help.
If a revolution would provide us with hope and the possibility of respite, then it looks like that time is long past. Gloomy and miserable a picture I may be painting, but I fear that we humans are in terminal decline and the humans that are becoming more prevalent have a tendency to be more narcissistic, less informed and with more of a leaning towards egotistically driven violence. To talk is to risk condemnation for wrong-think and so no one talks. This kind of population replacement inhibits the desire to work out differences and to find working solutions. Instead, of tolerance and diversity of thought, we are forced to adopt ill-considered dictates that ignore reason, evidence and reality. It stands to destroy all that was ever good because of lacking the capacity to understand it. The arrogant new age controllers who believe they know the truth of things while worshiping delusion, want gratification now, not because they need it, but because it is what their infantile minds demand. They lack the ability and patience to create, design and construct. Instead, they are addicted to the dopamine hits they get from destruction, the power they wield and the harm of those most of whom they do not even know. Regrettably that mindset will be the death of us all, including all other life forms.
It may seem like paranoia but, if you have not already started then you need to get ready for the time when the electricity fails; the money supply dries up; the thought police come to your home; your food supply becomes prohibitively expensive and rarefied.
You need to prepare for survival, including having adequate defence and protection for your person, your family and your essential supplies. We should all be striving to establish an independent resource supply, but we also need a strategy for it to have a chance of working. It is too late when you have invaders, who may well be psychopathic, and you are having to beg for their mercy while they plunder your precious resources and harm your loved ones.
We need to diversify as many aspects of our lives as possible, so that we are not beholden to those who mean us ill while masquerading as our friends.]]>