Teen Boy Missing For 3 Years Finally Returns Home. But …

Everything Is Not As It Seems

By Ryan Unger

Story provided by Boredom Therapy Staff

Nicholas Barclay was a young boy from San Antonio, Texas, who had a troubled family life. According to those closest to him, he frequently fought with his parents and teachers, and he would often act out aggressively toward those around him.
When a young boy from Texas went missing in 1994, his family was distraught. A few years later, however, he was found—in a different country. His family was ecstatic by the turn of events, but it soon turned out that not all was as it seemed.
Barclay4
Nicholas had even gotten himself into enough trouble that he had a court hearing scheduled due to his disruptive behavior. Little did his family know, however, Nicholas would never make it to the hearing.
The night before Nicholas was scheduled to appear in court, he went out to play basketball with a few friends. After the game was over, the boys all returned home, but Nicholas was never seen again. 
Nicholas’s family initially assumed he ran away to avoid the court hearing, but as time went on, they realized he was missing. Nearby counties were alerted, and flyers were distributed, but sadly no one was able to offer any clues as to his whereabouts.
Barclay2
Finally, on an otherwise normal morning in 1997—a full three years after Nicholas went missing—the Barclay family received a phone call from authorities that left them stunned. The police said they’d found Nicholas!
They explained that a young man claiming to be Nicholas was found in a small town in Spain. It was the miracle the family had been awaiting for three exhausting years. Nicholas was immediately put on a plane and sent back to Texas to reunite with his eager family.
 Barclay3
Both the family and police desperately wanted to find out what happened three years earlier. Nicholas claimed that he’d been kidnapped and immediately put on a plane to Europe where he was sold into a child sex-trafficking ring. Police in Spain found him, he said, only after he’d escaped.
It’s understandable that such a traumatic event would change a person, but the boy’s mother immediately noticed some off: his hair and eye color were, oddly, different. Nicholas claimed his captors dyed his hair and medically changed the color of his eyes to hide his identity.
Barclay5 
As unusual as the differences were, his family firmly believed their son had returned home, even if some family members had their doubts. However, one private investigator named Charlie Parker found the whole story suspicious…
Charlie didn’t believe the kidnappers were physically able to change the boy’s eye color. Also, if what Nicholas said was true, the horrific events he lived through would have most certainly caused him to become withdrawn—but that wasn’t the case at all.
Barclay7
Charlie and other investigators closely examined photos of Nicholas before and after his alleged kidnapping. Besides the eye and hair change, he noticed one more difference that resulted in an alarming breakthrough.
It was the ears! Ears, like fingerprints, are completely unique to an individual, and this young man’s ears didn’t match the boy who disappeared three years earlier. But, if the person they found wasn’t Nicholas Barclay, who exactly were investigators talking to?

It was actually a 23-year-old Frenchman named Frederic Bourdin who was posing as the 16-year-old boy. Frederic was also known as “the Chameleon” by Interpol, the world’s largest police organization.
Frederic was a wanted criminal who impersonated missing children, and over the course of his life, he had masqueraded as hundreds of different personalities—his most recent being Nicholas Barclay.

Frederic apparently got the idea to impersonate the missing boy when the Spanish police who found him said he bore a striking resemblance. That was all he needed to hear to pull off his next stunt.
Charlie Parker immediately told the Barclay family what he and the rest of the investigators discovered. They were in complete dismay at the news. How had they not realized this grown man wasn’t actually Nicholas?
Nicholas’s uncle Jason apparently began to doubt the authenticity of his “nephew” after he arrived home; shortly before Jason was interviewed, however, he’d passed away. After Frederic’s outing by police, the Frenchman proposed his own outrageous theory.
Frederic claimed the Barclay family knew he wasn’t their son all along, and the reason they accepted him was to cover up his murder! As absurd as it was, Charlie Parker still wanted to investigate the claim. Was the young boy’s aggressive nature too much for his family?
Charlie never found conclusive evidence that the Barclays had a hand in Nicholas’s disappearance. He even want as far as digging through the Barclays’ backyard in search of a body, but he came up empty-handed.
Barclay13 
Even though he hadn’t found any substantial evidence, Charlie didn’t quite believe the Barclay family was completely innocent in Nicholas’s disappearance. The family, of course, said otherwise, but with all the mysterious circumstances surrounding the case, no one could be sure.
This case is far more than just bizarre, it’s almost unreal. Who knows if the truth behind what happened to Nicholas Barclay will ever come out, but until then, Charlie Parker will keep looking for clues.

COMMENT

This mystery case reeks of having something terribly wrong. Nicholas had tattoos. He actually looks nothing like Frederic and what about DNA testing? Charlie Parker was absolutely right to be suspicious, but I would take it a stage further.
According to the report, young Nicholas was troubled and expressed his problems through aggression. This is one of the symptoms of a child being abused. What if he was being sexually abused? What if his outward aggression was due to this? What if his abuser decided to murder him because he might reveal all in his impending court case? Could it be that someone in his family circle was a psychopath?
Psychopaths are ultra selfish people and tend to regard others, including their own children, as inanimate objects. It would be nothing for such a person to kill their own.
It was also ironic that his uncle passed away shortly after the impostor arrived. Okay, people die naturally, but what if he was helped. There are so many loose ends in this story, including were any of the family questioned over the possible murder of young Nicholas?
Will the truth ever be known?
Barclay14
 
[simple-payment id=”921″]
[contact-form][contact-field label=”Name” type=”name” required=”1″ /][contact-field label=”Email” type=”email” required=”1″ /][contact-field label=”Comment” type=”textarea” required=”1″ /][/contact-form]]]>

Move to Murder

TOMMY ROBINSON SENT TO UNOFFICIAL DEATH ROW

I discovered on 14th June 2018, that journalist and campaigner, Tommy Robinson, had been moved to HMP Leicester with a Muslim population of over 70%. Already, death threats were  made against him and, apparently his first night spent there was one with prisoners banging constantly, baying for his harm. This transfer was on the authority of the new Home Secretary, Sajid Javid, ironically a Muslim minister in Theresa May’s cabinet. I should point out that Mrs. May has always been involved in the persecution of Tommy Robinson which seemed to coincide with when she was originally appointed as Home Secretary.
Tommy Robinson is a political prisoner and has been incarcerated at the pleasure of the UK Government. Indications are they want him dead, but dare not do it by blatantly assigning a state employee to carry out the execution, so they go for the cowardly option of putting him amongst groups who desperately want to kill him as part of their Jihad against dissent towards Allah and Mohammed and his open objection to the state’s covering up of child rape while displaying reluctance to bring those responsible to justice.

An Informal Death Sentence

Tommy Robinson’s transfer is a death sentence awaiting an executioner just as it was for Kevin Crehan, the non-violent, bacon-on-mosque ‘attacker’ who lasted just six months before his murder on 27th December 2016.
Kevin Crehan
To further illustrate his peril, Britain First leader, Paul Golding, was assaulted in prison in March 2018 at HMP Elmley, again by Muslim inmates.  The risks to those whom the establishment labels as ‘Far Right’ are well known, so the UK Government, with its obligation of exercising a ‘Duty of Care’, in reality seem not to care about the safety of political prisoners.

Myth of the Far Right

It seems to be a state sanctioned label to call anyone you do not like or who calls out the corruption within the system as ‘Far Right’. This is used in nearly all media statements and is a derogatory association that is never properly explained.
I have made contact with actual Far Right people to learn about their opinion of Tommy Robinson. They do not like him and claim that he is too Jew friendly.
The blatant disregard for basic human rights afforded to Kevin Crehan and Paul Golding is almost on a par with the Soviet and North Korean gulags. It is also a path that the UK Government is wilfully choosing to follow. They are using or, perhaps more accurately, misusing laws designed to control actual terrorists and highly subjective hate speech laws to silence mouth-pieces that try to point out the truth. They also seem happy to allow communist thugs to threaten and attack controversial political figures with impunity.
Tommy Robinson was focussing on the mass abuse by Pakistani and Muslim grooming gangs, but I have found that the paedophile issue goes even farther than them.

The Cancerous Web of Paedophilia

I am always reluctant to adopt a conspiracy theory position but, from other sources, there appears to exist, a sinister culture of child sexual slavery and exploitation that runs through the British establishment like a cancerous web. It is at every level of society and involves quite powerful and influential people within the Government, the police and the media. If only to exemplify this, it is worth watching the revelations of whistleblower and ex-CID police officer at Scotland Yard, John Wedger. He joins a list of courageous people who have risked life and everything to speak out. What part the paedo-monsters have to play in affecting the decision making process of the immoral and spineless Prime Minister May we are not privy to know. However, what is clear is that they are content to endanger the life of working class hero, Tommy Robinson, without fear of consequence.

Call to the Office of Cabinet Minister Penny Mordaunt

Penny Mordaunt1Deeply concerned with not just Tommy Robinson’s safety, but also possible implications of what will happen should he come to harm, I phoned my MP’s office (Rt Hon Penny Mordaunt MP) as soon as I learned of his transfer to a dangerous prison. I told them that her letter in reply to an earlier letter I had sent, concerning his initial incarceration, was almost identical to that of another complainant who had contacted his MP in Winchester. It suggested a standardized response.

I explained (and was assured that my message would be passed on) that I attended Free Speech and Tommy Robinson rallies, not simply to lend support, but also to find out what sort of people went to these events.
[wpvideo Vm1mgZ0k]
I have been unable to find any so-called Far Right people. I urged that this pejorative term be remove from reports as it was not what attendees are and is only inflaming resentment.
The ones I met at these rallies I shadowed, observed, listened to and engaged with. They were ordinary, working class people who care deeply about free speech and their children. They came to join with others; to listen to speakers and to express their dissatisfaction with the failure to act to protect children. No one is talking to them except people like Tommy Robinson. To simply dismiss them as Far Right is a grave mistake.
Opponents of Tommy Robinson have been challenged to find anything racist that he has said. They have failed.
Right now, the government and the UK establishment have lost legitimacy. His former criminal charges and convictions are being regarded as illegitimate and politically motivated. People are defiant and angry. Meanwhile the Government sets about targeting vulnerable individuals with bogus hate speech crimes. The main reason they maintain power is because the complicit media are stifling truth and reality. This situation is a powder keg.
Taking Tommy Robinson was done while he was alone. That itself was cowardly. To place him on death row surrounded by malevolent inmates is throwing him to the lions. It is an utter disgrace; an insult to what it means to be British and an embarrassment in the eyes of the world. Tommy Robinson is a political prisoner of the UK Government; a dangerously corrupt and incompetent regime that is dragging us toward civil war and, by so doing committing acts of treason against the British people.

FOR BRITAIN PARTY

FOR BRITAIN SUPPORTER INTERVIEW

Interview of a For Britain supporter plus a snippet of Anne Marie Waters speaking at a #FreeTommy rally in London.

ISLAM and THE LEFT-RIGHT DIVIDE

Many of the people supporting Tommy Robinson are libertarians, not Far Rightist. Standing against the people are the political classes; the legal establishment and the media. Nigel Farage sides with them. He ‘flip-flops’ whenever the subject of Islam arises. He turns into an ‘eel’, slipping and sliding to avoid giving a definitive answer.
The standard of political discourse has declined badly over the past twenty years. Now, it is not enough to disagree with someone else. Civilized discussion is itself becoming a subversive action.
The current Conservative administration has a feminist prime minister and is as left wing as it has ever been. Radical feminism has close associations with Marxist doctrine. If you are not on board with the globalist Leftist agenda then that puts you in the same camp as the vilified Far Right even if you have nothing to do with them.
There seems to be no adequate definition given by the chattering elites to what ‘Far Right’ means. So, I will try to give one here.
Politics is, simply put, the relationship between the individual and the state (or the collective if you want to call it something else). If you are on the Left, you support significant state control over individuals. The extreme of the Left is totalitarianism where the state governs every aspect of your life.
The Right is minimal state and favours individual freedom over state control. It means that the real Far Right are anarchists where there is no state at all. The Nazis (National Socialists) and Fascists are creations of the Far Left. They wanted and used the state to impose their will on the people. For Britain is nowhere near these positions; nor does it aspire to be.
One common feature of those who want to control everything is that of authoritarianism. It is probably why the Left are in love with Islam. Islam and the Far Left are both totalitarian and both use authoritarian methods to enforce their will. Each ‘dreams’ of their own utopia. The Left longs for a class-free society and fully egalitarian-heaven-on-Earth. Islam intends to establish a global caliphate where Allah’s will is supreme.
For Britain are wanting to stop Islamic authoritarianism being established. Islamophobic? A phobia is an irrational fear. It is not irrational to reject a totalitarian and potentially brutal system of social and psychological control. That seems pretty rational. Furthermore, if you object to the severities of what the caliphate is promising to bring through the Sharia, then supporting For Britain is a perfectly rational choice.

James Williams

LABOUR PARTY THUG ATTACKS REPORTER

During A Free Tommy Rally in London on 9th June 2018, a Labour Party thug attacked Chimes Media reporter, blocking his camera, trying to grab at it and making bodily contact.   [wpvideo rNQF2N6Z]   STATEMENT NOTED DOWN SHORTLY AFTER THE INCIDENT FROM JAMES WILLIAMS: “THE GUY CAME OUT OF NOWHERE AND MADE RIGHT FOR ME. HE WAVED A HAND IN FRONT OF THE CAMERA AND TRIED TO GRAB IT. I TURNED TO AVOID HIM AND HE MADE PHYSICAL CONTACT. “HE HAD AT LEAST ONE ACCOMPLICE WITH HIM AND HELD A PINT OF BEER IN A PLASTIC CUP AND CAME ONTO ME A SECOND TIME. I WAS EXPECTING HIM TO THROW IT OVER ME. THEN, HE STARTED HURLING ABUSE AND VULGARITIES TRYING TO PROVOKE A FIGHT. IT WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN A GOOD MOVE AS HE HAD WITNESSES ON HIS SIDE SO I MOVED AWAY AND HE CONTINUED HIS ABUSE AS I CROSSED THE ROAD TO RE-POSITION AT THE ENTRANCE OF WHITEHALL TO CARRY ON FILMING.” [gallery ids="35806,35807" type="rectangular"] COMMENT You never know where and when you are going to meet these characters. In my youth, I was a Labour Party activist operating in Lincolnshire. I felt I was supporting a moral cause to improve the lives of the poor and disadvantaged. I did not encounter the ‘hostiles’ until after I moved to Portsmouth and began engaging there. It’s a long story, but I found certain senior officials wanted to vet you. These were not appointed officials. I had this in Lincolnshire as well as in Portsmouth, perhaps it was a way of looking for compliant types and leaders? Labour Thug4 All I will say is that the guy who attacked in Trafalgar Square, wore a fixed smile as you will see from the film. Having studied the behaviour of psychopaths and how they behave, the ‘fixed smile’ is how they present themselves. It is a smile that indicates their own belief in their own superiority. Could he be one of the 1%? On a chance encounter, it is not possible to verify but, out of all the thousands of people around, he singled me out for attention in the same way a predator would do; just as a psychopath would do. I was separate from the herd and alone and I was unsuspecting.]]>

James Williams mashes Nigel Farage over his criticism of Tommy Robinson

James Williams mashes Nigel Farage Chimes Media founder, James Williams, mashes Nigel Farage over the latter’s criticism of Tommy Robinson. Working class hero, Tommy Robinson who stands up for the forgotten and ignored. Tommy Robinson speaks out against the malevolence and intent of Islam while Nigel Farage avoids even saying the word “Islam”.

Libertarian Support Tommy Robinson

Many of the people supporting Tommy Robinson are libertarians, not Far Rightist. Standing against the people are the political classes; the legal establishment and the media. Mr. Farage sides with them. He displays his class prejudice by attacking Tommy Robinson. By calling Tommy Robinson stupid and not very bright he decries those who look to Tommy Robinson as their voice. Nigel Farage should be standing shoulder to shoulder with Tommy Robinson to defend free speech. Nigel Farage should also be more prominent in condemning the wide-scale harm being done to our children and the Islamification of Britain. [wpvideo 1fdJAnNN]]]>

Questions about Sharia for Candidates

All Muslims who run for elective office should be asked questions about Sharia. It’s not enough to reject Sharia, we want it condemned and the foundation on which it rests, Allah and Mohammed.   [wpvideo yp5LdpPH] They may say that Sharia is just a religious concept or that there are parts of Sharia they don’t practice. However, only part of Sharia is about how to practice Islam. But it is not enough to reject a particular part of Sharia. All of Sharia is based on the Koran and the Sunna of Mohammed. If you reject Sharia you must also reject the underlying Koran and Sunna. We must ask for the person to condemn and abjure the Koran and Sunna that support the rejected Sharia. Take wife beating as an example. Wife beating is part of the Koran (4:34) and the Sunna. We must ask a Muslim not only to reject wife beating, but to condemn and abjure the Koran and Sunna that support the Sharia doctrine. In short, the Koran and the Sunna about wife beating is wrong. The election season is upon us. We must use the race as a golden opportunity to educate the voting public about Sharia and how to reject it. Source by permission from Bill Warner: Sign up for Bill Warner’s newsletter at www.politicalislam.com Buy Bill’s books at: www.politicalislam.com/shop Follow Bill Warner: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/billwarnerau… Twitter: https://twitter.com/PoliticalIslam Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/politicalislam https://vimeo.com/user40284186 Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/user-460569656   [simple-payment id=”926″]   [contact-form][contact-field label=”Name” type=”name” required=”1″ /][contact-field label=”Email” type=”email” required=”1″ /][contact-field label=”Comment” type=”textarea” required=”1″ /][/contact-form]]]>

Fermi Paradox: Where Are the Aliens?

By Elizabeth Howell, Space.com Contributor   The Fermi Paradox seeks to answer the question of where the aliens are. Given that our star and Earth are part of a young planetary system compared to the rest of the universe — and that interstellar travel might be fairly easy to achieve — the theory says that Earth should have been visited by aliens already. As the story goes, Italian physicist Enrico Fermi, most famous for creating the first nuclear reactor, came up with the theory with a casual lunchtime remark in 1950. The implications, however, have had extraterrestrial researchers scratching their heads in the decades since. “Fermi realized that any civilization with a modest amount of rocket technology and an immodest amount of imperial incentive could rapidly colonize the entire galaxy,” the Search For Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) Institute in Mountain View, California, said on its website. “Within ten million years, every star system could be brought under the wing of empire. Ten million years may sound long, but in fact it’s quite short compared with the age of the galaxy, which is roughly ten thousand million years. Colonization of the Milky Way should be a quick exercise.” Fermi Fermi reportedly made the initial remark, but he died in 1954. Publication fell to other people, such as Michael Hart, who wrote an article titled “An Explanation for the Absence of Extraterrestrials on Earth” in the Royal Astronomical Society (RAS) Quarterly Journal in 1975. (Some say this is the first such paper to explore the Fermi paradox, although this claim is a bit hard to prove.) “We observe that no intelligent beings from outer space are now present on Earth,” Hart wrote in the abstract. “It is suggested that this fact can best be explained by the hypothesis that there are no other advanced civilizations in our galaxy.” He noted, however, that more research in biochemistry, planetary formation and atmospheres was needed to better narrow down the answer. While Hart was more of the opinion that we were the only advanced civilization in the galaxy (he argued that in Earth’s history, somebody could have visited us already unless they started their journey less than two million years ago), he outlined four arguments exploring the paradox: 1) Aliens never came because of a physical difficulty “that makes space travel infeasible,” which could be related to astronomy, biology or engineering. 2) Aliens chose never to come to Earth. 3) Advanced civilizations arose too recently for aliens to reach us. 4) Aliens have visited Earth in the past, but we have not observed them. The argument has been challenged on many grounds. “Maybe star travel is not feasible, or maybe nobody chooses to colonize the galaxy, or maybe we were visited long ago and the evidence is buried with the dinosaurs — but the idea has become entrenched in thinking about alien civilizations,” wrote Fermi paradox researcher Robert H. Gray in a 2016 Scientific American blog post. Frank Tipler, a professor of physics at Tulane University, followed up on the argument in 1980 with a paper titled “Extraterrestrial intelligent beings do not exist,” also published in the RAS Quarterly Journal. The bulk of his paper dealt with how to get resources for interstellar travel, which he suggested could be achieved by having some kind of self-replicating artificial intelligence moving from star system to star system and create copies using materials there. Since these beings aren’t on Earth, Tipler argued we are likely the only intelligence out there. He also said that those who believe in extraterrestrial intelligence are similar those who think about UFOs, because both camps believe “we are going to be saved from ourselves by some miraculous interstellar intervention.” Today, the topic of extraterrestrial intelligence is a popular one, with several papers appearing every year from different researchers. It’s also been fueled by the discovery of exoplanets. Fermi2

Plentiful planets

The universe is incredibly vast and old. One estimate says the universe spans 92 billion light-years in diameter (while growing faster and faster). Separate measurements indicate it is about 13.82 billion years old. At first blush, this would give alien civilizations plenty of time to propagate, but then they would have a cosmic distance barrier to cross before getting too far into space. Fermi first formed his theory long before scientists found planets outside of our solar system. There are now more than 3,000 confirmed planets, with more being found frequently. The sheer number of planets that we have found outside of our solar system indicates that life could be plentiful. FOR MORE OF THIS CLICK HERE]]>