BANNING TOMMY

Break the Mainstream Media control over your mind! Most people are shackled like zombies to their lies and selective bias. Stop paying the BBC licence fee and stop buying their crummy newspapers. Starve them of their funding just as they try to do to dissenters like Tommy Robinson.

The banning of Tommy Robinson from Facebook, Instagram (and one of his books on Amazon) came within 24 hours of his expose of the morally bankrupt BBC and their allies in the Mainstream Media (which is just about all of them).

Use of the term Far Right is a warning you are about to be subjected to propaganda

Long before Tommy Robinson hit the scene I, and other associates, had been battling the BBC for many years over their indifference and misrepresentation of men and boys by the media in favour of Marxist feminist doctrine. Men’s rights advocates have consistently been labelled as right wing extremist types and misogynists. The Marxist element insists on breaking up groups into oppressors and oppressed. To them, and with few exceptions, men are oppressors and women the oppressed. This view has been held with cult-like intensity in spite of a mountain of evidence disproving the theory.

The BBC has done very little to diffuse this concept. In fact advocates who courageously stepped forward to argue the case that men suffered every bit as badly as women in domestic abuse and even worse in terms of the justice system, homelessness and education would find themselves outnumbered 3 to 1 on panel discussions and TV sofa chats.

Tommy Robinson came in from a different angle. He saw the Islamification of Britain by mass migration as a serious threat to British culture and to non-Muslim citizens. Again, the model of Marxist thinking rears its ugly head since the media has nurtured the view that Muslims are the oppressed class while white males, such as Tommy Robinson, are the oppressors. The British establishment determined that Tommy Robinson posed a serious threat to their domination of public institutions and the media and, just as importantly, people’s thoughts. He did so by revealing what lies and propaganda are used to deceive and mind control the British public. He had to be silenced and killed if necessary to shut him up.

On Saturday 23rd February, he turned the tables on them. He had been the target of a hit-piece documentary by BBC’s flagship program Panorama. In his documentary, Panodrama, he used plants and hidden cameras to expose just how corrupt, racist, devious and contemptuous the BBC are towards ordinary, working class people.

His efforts demonstrated just how ideologically driven the BBC and the MSM really are. They are not honest journalists objectively reporting the news as it happens. Instead, they are more akin to political activists. What his expose also revealed was that big media and tech corporations are working hand in hand with each other to control and direct propaganda in a deliberate attempt to misinform and silence wrongthink.

Interestingly enough, the book that was banned off of Amazon was Mohammed’s Koran which is a critical look at Muslim’s holy book. What is more, one of the main executioners in banning Tommy Robinson was Muslim activist, Mohammed Shafiq, who is in the pay of BBC but also was able to get immediate access to Facebook executives and get another person banned. Can anyone do this to anyone else? The action has revealed how much in bed the establishment is with each other and how little ordinary people mean to them (apart from taking their money).

Break their control over your mind! Most people are shackled like zombies to their lies and selective bias. Stop paying the licence fee and stop buying their crummy newspapers. Starve them of their funding just as they try to do to dissenters like Tommy Robinson. They fear us, but they are utterly ruthless and pathological. They have been shown to be physically dangerous. There is supposedly no death penalty in the UK, but the state will withdraw protection, especially from political prisoners, making undesirable vulnerable to violence in prison. They will encourage violence by zombified gangs on peaceful protesters. They carry out brutal police raids on those who say the wrong thing or think wrongly. Meanwhile they have ignored and covered up for the rape of children. It is time they were shut down and put out of business. They are not our friends, but our thought managers. While they have their power, there is no real freedom of speech.

Southampton Red Pill Group

 

Black Label Logic  FULL ARTICLE

This is an extract from Black Label Logic on the Red-Blue pill theory regarding gender relations.: When I wrote the blue and red pill theoretical framework the goal was to identify the mutual exclusivity of the two frameworks. I deliberately left out the purple pill, as it requires its own essay due to the fact that it appears to contradict the mutual exclusivity that was outlined in the other essay. To define the purple pill, it is a position that seeks to enable a man to have the blue pill fantasy, while remaining red pill. In essence leveraging his red pill knowledge in order to experience the blue pill fantasy. In a sense, once a man learns red pill knowledge, it is impossible to return to the Matrix without significant dissonance, unlike Cypher, there is simply no way to have your mind wiped clean of all aspects of the red pill. It may be suppressed for a time, or channeled through a defense mechanism or two, but the idealism that is required for a true blue pill fantasy is gone and what remains is merely a hollow shell. Central to the blue pill fantasy is the idea of there being a “one“, a perfect partner who fulfills your every need. Leaving out the part where perfection is a human conception that has no place in reality, and if it did would at best exist in a moment by moment basis, there is no such thing as a perfect partner. Someone may be a better fit for you than another, in transient moments it may feel as they are perfect but this is an illusion. A man cannot at the same time accept AWALT and view his partner in the manner required for the blue pill. From my research on the topic, the reasoning behind a purple pill perspective is to attempt a circumnavigation of the principles that are core to the red pill, such s solipsism, hypergamy and “all women are like that“. It is also based in an illusion of control, through which if the husband is red pill enough, he can alter her biological firmware, through constant vigilance. Throughout history, female nature was socially controlled through various means, religion, social shaming and jurisprudence are some of them. For instance, British divorce law from pre-1900 where the husband would automatically gain custody over the children in the event of divorce played on a female being attached to her children to reduce branch swinging, and to police her behavior. Nathaniel Hawthorne’s “The Scarlet Letter“, demonstrates how social shaming and shunning could be utilized to reduce the tendency for hypergamy, through it having social and financial consequences. The severe biblical punishments for adultery served to further reduce the inherent tendencies of the human female. The purple pill perspective is therefore, that a man standing alone as long as he is alpha and red pill aware enough can be different from the myriad of other men who were unable to accomplish what an entire society creates incentives against. To make this essay comparable with the other essay, I will go through the purple pill perspective on each point from it.

Be Your Best Self So You Can Just Be Yourself

Chimes Media is viewer funded.

If you would be kind enough to donate please do so here: https://chimes.media/donations/ Please subscribe at https://www.subscribestar.com/chimes-media]]>

 

Quitters and the Rise of Anti-Semitism

Nazis are Creatures from the Left[/caption] Mid February 2019 witnessed nine Labour MPs resigning the Labour Party with eight of them joining with three Conservative MPs to form the Independent Group. The group has formed in opposition to the Labour and Conservative parties’ stance on Brexit. The one Labour MP who declined to join this group was apparently supportive of leaving the EU. It is interesting that this should happen within about 6 weeks of the Brexit leaving date of 29th March 2019. However, there was another, very important reason for all nine (with possibly more on the way) leaving the Labour Party and that was due to the prevalence of persistent Anti-Semitism in Labour that has arisen since Jeremy Corbyn took over the leadership. Now, I have some sympathies for Jeremy Corbyn in this regard because I do not believe that what has happened was of his making, but rather due as a consequence of the give-away cost of joining the Labour Party before he became leader.

The Video: Quitters

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjNkDIVX8hY

Rise of Anti-Semitism in the Labour Party

The dropping of Labour Party membership to £2 (currently £3) for young people and students encouraged a surge in intake and swelled Labour’s card carrying members to over 500,000. However, ideology and tolerance were never qualifying factors for getting signed up. It was just a policy of “come in and be one of us. Join our growing army and take back control of our country. Socialism is the way forward.” Jeremy Corbyn, with this fresh intake was propelled from being a mere backbencher into becoming the iconic symbol of socialism in Britain and potential its Prime Minister. The presence of anti-Semitism within the Labour Party is an ugly carbuncle that will not go away because these types are now entrenched within the Party and have the weight of numbers on their side.  Many of its young and new members are Muslim and many others associate with the Far Left Momentum Group which boasts to have 40,000 of those members. That is an army with a significant number of anti-Semites in their ranks. The anti-Semitism seems to have two fold basis; one is a fundamental hatred of Jews and the other is vehement opposition to the existence of the Jewish state of Israel.

The Devil’s Prongs – Islam and Socialism

Meaning of Politics

Politics is about the relational dynamics of the individual (the fundamental unit) with the collective (the state/ community). Simplistically, Rightism is pro-individualism and the supremacy and freedom of the individual. Leftism is pro-state and for extending its power with individual freedom being subordinate.

Islam and Socialism

The word “Islamaphobia” is an invented word to enslave the weak minded and suppress dissident voices and apostates. It is a term being used to gag and persecute those who object to an extreme authoritarian ideology colonizing state after state and compelling individuals within those states to kneel to Allah and his Prophet. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0EYg8Tgrh0o Both Islam and Socialism require the power of the state to enforce the policies and rules as is deemed fit. Both are authoritarian in nature. It is thus hardly surprising that Islam should find open ears and minds to its puritanical orthodoxy among hard-line socialists. Both use identitarianism to discriminate between who benefits and who suffers. With socialism it is about the oppressed versus the oppressor and with Islam it is Muslims versus Kaffirs. Historically, it has been estimated that over 200 million people died in India alone due to the brutality of Islamic regimes. The barbarism and enslavement of captured came with a high death toll in most places. In Africa 120 million died. Black boys often suffered penectomy and castration and bled to death in agony. Jews, Christians, Hindus, Buddhists and Pagans were slaughtered in their millions. One million white slaves were taken from Europe. From the trail of bones found by explorers, it seems there was only a one in five chance of making it to the slave ships that carried black people off to the Americas. The experiment with socialism in the 20th Century witnessed the barbaric destruction of an estimated 170 million lives. The numbers can only be estimated because many just disappeared. In every country it has been tried, Socialism has brought economic ruin, oppression and death.

Nazis Find an Ideological Home

The National Socialists of the 20th Century were fundamentally socialist with doctrines that aligned to Marxist thinking. It was always a creature of the Left in spite of the false spin that is presented to the credulous masses. Many National Socialists expressed a disdain for capitalism. As with other forms of socialism, National Socialism used the power of the state to enforce its will and to exert social control over all citizens and institutions.

In National Socialism: National is the adjective; Socialism is the noun.

Clash of Utopias

With dynamic forces causing serious rifts due to conflicts over Brexit and a significant number of its members who possess a natural hatred of Jews and the existence of Israel, the Labour Party is on the point of splitting irreparably. The peril that Europe currently faces with mass immigration has allowed a virtual invasion force of millions of Muslims to move onto European soil to stay. The process is called Hijra and is about spreading the doctrine of Islam through migration and out-breeding native populations until a Global Caliphate is established. In the case of Socialism it is about establishing a Socialist Utopia. Utopias are like Gods. They provide promise of the ideal society for their disciples, but the socialist utopia is not the global caliphate. They cannot live side by side. One may stand but only at the cost of the other. Whatever may come, it promises massive suffering and many more disappeared people, not just in the tens of millions but probably far worse. It is a very bleak prospect for all and should be resisted, but with the pathetically weak leadership that exists it is looking more and more like a lost game.]]>

Banning of Peter Hitchens

Peter Hitchens Non Visit to Portsmouth University Sunday Mail columnist and author, Peter Hitchens was barred from giving a speech at Portsmouth University on Tuesday 12th February 2019. He had been prepared to make the two hour journey to Portsmouth at his own expense and not even charge a fee. However, the snowflakes of the LGBT+ community at the university decided that he had made unacceptable comments in the past about LGBT matters and, as they had just completed their pride month to celebrate themselves, his presence would not be appreciated.

Attack on Free Speech

They did not tell him specifically that he had been barred, but that his event had been ‘delayed’; i.e. postponed. In Peter Hitchens’ eloquent words: “…the truth is that they stopped the event because they don’t like my opinions. That proves they cannot be trusted with freedom of speech. They came up with one pretext for policing thought and imposing censorship this time. They are equally capable of coming up with another, whenever required.”         [caption id="attachment_46711" align="alignright" width="300"] Eden Ladley[/caption]   As he pointed out to Eden Ladley, the LGBT+ officer for the Portsmouth Students Union (UPSU), the delay was a human decision, not one brought on by physical barriers such as structural failure in the building.         He went on to say: “I suspect that many students have far too few chances to hear views that are different from the standard-issue conformist Leftism that is their normal diet. What upsets me about this ban is that it is a general menace to freedom of speech, thought and assembly.There were two petitions over whether Peter Hitchens should attend. 129 said he should not and 55 said he should. This is out of a student population of 23,000 which means only 0.8% participation and I am fairly sure that the vast majority of the students were never consulted. I am wholly in agreement with Peter Hitchens. He is a superb and entertaining speaker who loves debate. It is a huge loss to those students who are still free thinkers, but Leftist ideologues always act as though they have the authority to speak for all when they have no such mandate. It belies their authoritarian conviction in their own self-righteousness an is indicative of a pernicious form of narcissism. I have many issues with Peter Hitchens, but free speech is not one of them. Free speech is about the right to risk offence. It is not hate speech even though some may think it is. From UPSU’s comments on the subject, they clearly do not understand the concept.

The Video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VbJcBX1__bQ

Peter Hitchens – another Fake News Journalist

I used to be a huge fan of Peter Hitchen, but he has long since fallen off the pedestal that I once placed him on. I found that his opinionated views on President Trump and Tommy Robinson (Stephen Yaxley-Lennon) along with his failure to highlight the massive problem with high level incompetence and criminal activities, which are bringing western countries to their knees, smack of being complicit to the gross treason of leaders to towards the people they are supposed to represent. Peter Hitchens arrogantly proclaims that people can either follow him or Tommy Robinson and condemns those who would choose the latter. Personally, I am not impressed with mandatory directives. It is the likes of Tommy Robinson who have brought the subject of mass violence inflicted on children in the UK to the fore. He was the one who stood against the abuse that our soldiers endured on their return from campaigns abroad. He did so in the face of cynical criticism from the media.  Peter Hitchens, as with the rest of the privileged clan of journalists, says nothing and offers nothing. All he does is sneer at the messenger of the inferior social class. Peter Hitchens is not the one picking up the pieces of their lives after their teenage son has been run down by an Islamic thug. Tommy Robinson is boots on the ground and reporting it. Peter Hitchens’ has proven to be unreliable as an ally as highlighted by James Delingpole (Breitbart). He has been bewilderingly two-faced on Brexit – showing glowing happiness that people voted for it and then criticising the outcome. I am drawn to the conclusion that Peter Hitchens is an Oxbridge post-graduate snob. In spite of his seemingly controversial views, he belongs to an intellectual elite that look down their noses at the rest of us. He thinks he knows more than he does, but is detached from the sufferings of ordinary people. To his class, people like Donald Trump and Stephen Yaxley-Lennon are regarded as impudent and vulgar upstarts that should have no place in the corridors of power. The fact that the reason why we are in such a mess today, with white girls being molested on an industrial scale, is because elitist snobs like Peter Hitchens, say nothing and do nothing. One invective against Trump becoming President was that he was not qualified (as if you had to have some sort of certificate). By claiming this he implies that Hillary Clinton would be better. His obliviousness of her many high level crimes is plain to see as might be the case for those who live closeted lives. The thousands of deaths (including multiple murders) that lay squarely at Clinton’s door would make the Emperor Caligula look like a traffic warden by comparison. Trump has something like 75 structures erected across the globe. That took a lot of negotiating and a lot of understanding of foreign countries. May be that is why he got the red carpet treatment when he went to China (unlike Obama)? Trump has been bringing the prospect of real peace in Korea. He has enriched and seriously helped the American working classes. [caption id="attachment_46714" align="alignleft" width="300"] Out of Touch[/caption] Peter Hitchens chooses not to see these things, but clings to his arrogant, filtered view of things. It is clear from his comments that he does not know what is going on in the world. He says on his spat with UPSU: “This is what is coming. It begins like this, and it ends with arrests of dissidents at four in the morning, conducted by people who are quite sure that what they are doing is right.” These things are happening now! Tommy Robinson is not the only casualty of fascist weaponizing of the law against dissenters. It has been happening to hundreds of ordinary folk who mis-gender people or who express ‘wrong think’ or who have decried Islam. Police have already been turning up to snatch free thinking people from their homes.

Nail in the Coffin

A cross party group of MPs is drawing up legislation to make criticism of Islam a crime. With this, it can confidently be assumed that Free Speech is dead in the UK and where are the elitist media? In his criticism of Tommy Robinson he refers to a “very well researched article” by one of his Mail colleagues. The article is full of pejorative terms that detract from any hope of objective reporting. Peter Hitchens aligns himself with bilge like this. He is an enjoyable person to listen to and has a lot to say, but there is no substance to his words.

Peter Hitchens has allowed himself to become as much Fake News as the others in his Oxford intellectuals.

Journalism is in the sewer as many reporters live in different circles to the rest of us. Peter Hitchens should be in the vanguard to restore trust and truth, but instead wallows in the mud of deceit like the rest of his cohort. Why should anybody follow him or any other elitist?]]>

CHUCK HER

Feminist Fraud There are few more putrid sects in the world today than those from the cult of radicalized feminism. The amount of resources they dupe from sympathetic individuals and public finances runs into hundreds of millions of pounds/ dollars. Those that fact check their exaggerated claims about women’s suffering often do so, not to help those women, but to fill their coffers with the ‘gold’ of the gullible (which is usually somebody else’s money) and to promote their career and status as virtuous saints of the modern age.

Men vs Women Confrontation

Nasty women do not know how to scale down their own aggression when on the attack. They seem to lack a mental gauge that should tell them when to stop or to drop the subject of their angst. I have witnessed vile language coming from women in the streets who cannot help to denigrate a man in public. It is an Achilles heel for many men when they have to deal with a malevolent, confrontational, demanding or banshee woman. They often really do not know what to do or how to cope with the threat. Men will either (1) walk away, (2) absorb the vitriol or (3) turn to aggression. Men are forced to choose one of the three options due to their ineptitude in resolving disputes with women. They feel that whatever tactics they deploy almost invariably ends up bad for them or for some other innocent guy who stands in the way of the bullet.

Men Need Good Women

Usually men do not choose to become aggressive in public because they know it would invite a world of trouble for them. Members of the public tend to be total hypocrites in male-female disputes. They will refuse to intervene when a man is “getting it in the neck” i.e. subject to abuse. However, should he lay a hand on her, they are right there transmitting how narcissistically virtuous they are by defending women regardless of how obnoxious she may be. Ironically, it is in this regard, that men need women most. Men need level headed conservative type women to protect them from the aggression of a vicious female. In fact social experiments show that it is usually only women who will intervene to defend a man from abuse. Now when I say ‘conservative’, I am not referring to politics. I mean women who respect men and women for the characters that they are rather than the identity group they belong to. These women do not have to be any relationship with the man but, just as a kindly stranger may help someone in need of rescue, so a man being raked over the coals needs another woman to help him. There are such women and they can be of any age or social group, but they are like gold dust. They are the truly virtuous ones because they apply decent principles to their actions and tend to understand the dilemma of men who are under attack from women. Women who defend men should always be treasured and treated with the utmost respect. Many of them will have their brothers, fathers, husbands or boyfriends and some may have sons. However, they know that the dynamics and power of inter-sex relations lies with women and not with men. Many will have been brought up and have learned how males think and act from an early age. They will have seen real prejudice is inflicted on their beloved male associates while the victim-claiming women use feminist doctrines to fleece the system and men of money, assets and especially their children. Feminists are parasites who spread their poison for personal gain and good women know it that is why the vast majority of women refute feminism. Feminism has become anchored to the sentiments of hatred of the male and a lust for the material resources that men provide (most commonly through taxation).

Feminist Harpies

The feminist harpies of politics, education and law are plentiful. They have real power to affect the lives of women, men and especially children for good or bad. However, the modern feminist has two prime aims. The first one is for self gratification and the second is promoting their cause i.e. spreading their poison. Both aims feed their own toxic narcissism. They have no real concern for the interest of women; that is a pretence that is used to garnish resources from the unsuspecting and the gullible. When in positions that decide the fate of others, they tend to have a predetermined (prejudicial) view of how they believe things should be and then try to force reality to conform to their way of thinking. This is what feminist prejudice is. The toxicity of feminist poison seeps into all areas and will often be practiced by those who do not consider themselves feminists. It is why men are at a disadvantage when it comes to determining child custody arrangements. Feminism couples with the internalized thinking that women should be protected and males punished and is why males on trial tend to get harsher sentences.

The Video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_tiOlWkAwc

Men-Going-Their-Own-Way

Feminism is full of contradictions and has many damaging logical arguments against it, but the feminist counter is to simply dismiss objectivity as being patriarchal, misogynistic and immoral. From my research, I have found that 5% of women have sociopathic tendencies; 0.5% are psychopathic and probably about 20% more carry some form of psychotic condition. Men-Going-Their-Own-Way (MGTOW) individuals long ago declared they want as little to do with women as possible. But, this is condemning good and bad women alike when what should be encouraged is engaging and helping the good women to flourish. Malevolent women need to be called out and shamed for their wickedness, but men need good women to do it.

Screen out Feminists

There is a desperate need to screen out feminist cultists since they are causing lifelong harm to children and fostering hatred to be a more dominant emotion than love for young adults. Men are useless at combating this negativism. By contrast, truly good and virtuous women shine in the lives of all who care and especially children. For men trying to date women, you have to be blunt and direct. Do not waste time on feminists. They will suck resources out of you and chuck you when they have no further need for you. If a woman is authoritarian – chuck her. If a woman declares herself a feminist – chuck her. If she is neurotic and self centred – chuck her. If she expects you to pay for everything –chuck her. If you are in a long line of former boyfriends – chuck her. If she is a pathological liar – chuck her. If she does not make time for you –chuck her. Basically, you should ask her about herself. Be blunt and ask her. If she is offended, so-be-it; you will know something already. It’s best to get things straight from the start rather than let a monster screw your life up and kill your heart. If you leave things you will get too deeply in and find yourself forking out just to keep the relationship going. The longer you leave it, the more painful the split. On the other hand, if you have a girl who is cool then hold onto her and pay her due respect. If she turns out to be an angel, then paradise is just around the corner. Get with the right woman and life is peachy.

There are two types of women:

  • Bitches – keep away from these. They will bleed you dry and destroy your life.
  • Ladies – these are warm and caring and are worthy of respect, care and protecting.
The right woman and the right man are complimentary to each other and together can create some great kids for a better future, not just for that couple, but for many others.]]>

DIVERSIFYING DEPENDENCY

The Video (more dialogue beneath) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7MjvvVxS4Y&t=13s

Big Tech and Wrong-think

In Big Tech, internet services provided by mega companies like Google and Apple have led to many people becoming dependent on them in a variety of ways. They enable people to showcase creative content; to run businesses and to exchange personal messages. However, as the saying goes “Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely” and so it is that the assault on free speech and the shutting down of alternative views is well underway. Many hundreds have found themselves being demonetized, de-platformed and even banned for simply saying the wrong thing or holding the wrong views. In London alone, people have been arrested and charged with the offence of “Hate Speech” because they said the wrong thing. It makes you wonder if any of those executing these policies have read any history books or George Orwell. Worryingly, it is not just the wroth of censorship that wrong-thinkers are having to cope with. I will call them “Dissidents” because that is effectively what they are. Dissidents can now find themselves ‘hunted down’, doxed (having personal details published for all to see); their children risk being removed from their care. They can also their jobs and be declined employment. The concept of free speech is hanging by a thread and even those who never publish a word on the internet, find themselves fearful of expressing their views to colleagues, friends and family in case there are repercussions from word of their hate-think being found out.

Hurricane Lantern

[caption id="attachment_46676" align="alignleft" width="169"] Hurricane Lantern[/caption] Recently, I went in search of an oil-fired Hurricane lantern. Like most people, my household has become increasingly reliant on electricity (in its various delivery forms). The flick of a switch has become so customary that it is hard to live a day without the marvels and comfort that electricity brings. A hurricane lantern does not just emit good light, it is also a rudimentary provider of heat. It is safer than candles since the flame is enclosed. It is light and easy to use and you can adjust the wick to increase or decrease luminosity. The point of it is that it is largely independent of centrally controlled power and heat. I eventually found what I was looking for on Ebay for a price of just £7.39 (which included shipping costs). The problem came when I tried to pay for it. My trusty Barclay’s Debit card was rejected with no explanation given. A polite Ebay helper phoned me up, but was unable to resolve the problem. He suggested that I contact my bank, but revealed that Pay Pal processed card payments, even though I had deliberately avoided using Pay Pal on the payment options. A few weeks earlier I had cancelled my Pay Pal account and told them that I did not agree with their policy of compelling censorship of individuals that did not meet their version of ethical standards i.e. having non-left-wing views. To me financial organizations should not indulge in political sanctioning. To do so, smacks of real fascism and is extremely sinister for me, especially since I was brought up in a household that had been intimately affected by two world wars.

Cashless Society

There are moves afoot to turn our society into a cashless one where payments will be made through bank transactions, phone apps and cards. That is now, but it does not stop there because already the use of microchip technology has been introduced to workers in Sweden. Some workers have already agreed to having a rice-grain sized micro-chip planted in the web of skin between forefinger and thumb. It allows them access through certain doors and can be used to operate cars. How wonderfully convenient for consumers and workers! However, it is also wonderfully convenient for unscrupulous control by totalitarians who can turn off your access to resources on the whims of their desires. Dissident tongues in China are already suffering due to Government controlled sanctions provided by Google-type technology, and that is without any implants. It does not take a genius to work out where this leads to.

Real Bigotry

[caption id="attachment_46677" align="alignleft" width="300"] Calling out the real bigots[/caption] We are tracked every second of every day. While most people are harmless sheeple they are only regarded as such if they conform. Make an error of judgement such as overstay your time in a parking bay or mutter some ‘hate speech’ phrase under your breath and expect to suffer the oppression of a weaponized legal system brought to bear. You do not even have to have done anything wrong. By existing as a white male, you can find yourself marginalized by an increasingly corrupt anti-human system with its army of humanoid bots. The hostility that is being fostered against this sexual and racial group has disturbing similarities to what the Jews in Nazi Germany faced. White males are being denigrated as being privileged (even those born poor and raised by a single mother in the backstreets of Sheffield). This blatant policy of racial and gender hatred is being driven by an extremely pernicious group of actual privileged and bigoted people who have wormed their way into positions of influence and power in government and industry. It means the poor white boy from Sheffield can expect to be denied what few opportunities may have been available. He can expect to be skipped over in job applications or made to stand at the back of the queue if he needs help.

Gloomy Future

If a revolution would provide us with hope and the possibility of respite, then it looks like that time is long past. Gloomy and miserable a picture I may be painting, but I fear that we humans are in terminal decline and the humans that are becoming more prevalent have a tendency to be more narcissistic, less informed and with more of a leaning towards egotistically driven violence. To talk is to risk condemnation for wrong-think and so no one talks. This kind of population replacement inhibits the desire to work out differences and to find working solutions. Instead, of tolerance and diversity of thought, we are forced to adopt ill-considered dictates that ignore reason, evidence and reality. It stands to destroy all that was ever good because of lacking the capacity to understand it. The arrogant new age controllers who believe they know the truth of things while worshiping delusion, want gratification now, not because they need it, but because it is what their infantile minds demand. They lack the ability and patience to create, design and construct. Instead, they are addicted to the dopamine hits they get from destruction, the power they wield and the harm of those most of whom they do not even know. Regrettably that mindset will be the death of us all, including all other life forms.

Survival Preparation

It may seem like paranoia but, if you have not already started then you need to get ready for the time when the electricity fails; the money supply dries up; the thought police come to your home; your food supply becomes prohibitively expensive and rarefied. You need to prepare for survival, including having adequate defence and protection for your person, your family and your essential supplies. We should all be striving to establish an independent resource supply, but we also need a strategy for it to have a chance of working. It is too late when you have invaders, who may well be psychopathic, and you are having to beg for their mercy while they plunder your precious resources and harm your loved ones. We need to diversify as many aspects of our lives as possible, so that we are not beholden to those who mean us ill while masquerading as our friends.]]>

Covington Facecrime

‘Defamation Dream Team’ of Five Law Firms to Sue Journalists, Media

Outlets, and Celebrities Who Attacked Covington Kids

A team of very high profile lawyers are joining together to fight for justice for the Covington Catholic High School students who were ruthlessly attacked by the media following a school trip to DC for the March for Life.

According to lawyer Robert Barnes, who is representing several of the families, the team will include at least five lawyers from five different law firms — all with a record of high profile civil cases. Gateway Pundit

How it Started

A group of students from Covington Roman Catholic School had been taking part in a March for Life rally ain Washington DC. It is an all male school and some of the boys were as young as 14. They had split up into groups afterwards to do some sightseeing, but had been told be at the Lincoln Memorial by 5.30 pm to catch their buses for the return trip to Kentucky. Most arrived at 4.30 pm When they started assembling there were 4 or 5 African-American protesters near the steps. They identified as the Black Hebrew Israelites group. The boys kept away from them who then started hurling abuse and racist comments. From their own film, the protesters called the boys “racists,” “bigots,” “white crackers,” “faggots,” and “incest kids.” They also taunted an African American student from the school by telling him that we would “harvest his organs.” One student asked a teacher chaperone for permission to begin school spirit chants to counter the hateful things that were being shouted at them. The chants are used at sporting events and all positive in nature. The chants were loud because they wanted to drown out the hateful comments that were being shouted at them.

Lies of Nathan Philips

However, another group of Native American protesters arrived and approached the boys. The lead man was Nathan Phillips who began banging his drum and walked right into the group. The boys parted for him to let him through. Phillips was filmed going right up to one of the boys, Nick Sandmann who was wearing a red MAGA hat. Phillips came within inches of Nick’s face continually banging his drum. The boy was not sure what his intentions were so he stood his ground and smiled.       Everything was filmed by different cameras, but then the vile insults started. CNN were among the leaders along with many mainstream Fake News outlets. The boys were condemned as racists and bigots and all manner of threats and vulgarities vomited out. Calls for violence and obscenities to be visited upon the boys came from shrieking and hysterical celebrities. The malevolent sentiments were widely echoed across America and around the world aided and abetted by what have become know as the Fake News media.

Cowardly Clerics

However, among the abusing mob were the boys own clerics who threatened to have them expelled and were more than a little quick to throw their own children to the wolves without bothering to at least fact check first. Phillips, a long time Leftist activist tried to play the victim card by making claims of racism and abuse that were not backed up by the extensive evidence of the available film footage. This report could be many pages long, so it is best to display the pictures and play the Chimes Media video, Covington Facecrime.                   I will say, that if you cannot speak with the real bigots that hate white people, that hate men (especially white men) who hate western society, that hate the culture that is responsible for 98% of inventions in the modern world; that has done most to bring freedom to individuals whose ancestors had never known; if these people will not listen to reason, then talking is sadly over. The outcome is either we split and live separately or we fight and kill until one side wins.

 

Guns in UK Homes

Basics of Handgun Legislation in the UK

Following the Dunblane massacre in 1996, the UK Government passed the Firearms (Amendment) Act 1997 and the Firearms (Amendment) (No. 2) Act 1997, defining “short firearms” as Section 5 Prohibited Weapons. This effectively banned private possession of handguns (except for Northern Ireland). However, members of the public continued to own sporting rifles and shotguns, subject to licensing. There are 1.3 million licensed shotguns in the UK which amounts to about 1 in 64 people. However, there are also an additional 535,000 legally licensed ‘firearms’ which are not shotguns.

(VIDEO AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE)

[gallery ids="46466,46465,46463" type="columns"]

THE KALERGI PLAN FOR EUROPEAN GENOCIDE

However, since 1996, the social climate has changed considerably in some areas. The demographic has shifted so significantly that London and other cities are no longer inhabited by traditional British people. In fact many are becoming increasingly dominated by those who’s culture is hostile to that of the host nation.

 

This is being repeated in much of Europe and people are waking up to the fact that they are being replaced and all that made up those people’s society, their history, their traditions and their values, are set to be swept away. Naturally, there are the more prominent individuals who are speaking up and taking action. However, the plan to replace the European people was planned a long time ago through the Kalergi Plan. 

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE ABOUT The Kalergi Genocide Plan

The elites that are pushing this know and expect a reaction and so we have seen the rise and enforcement of Hate Speech laws. These are designed to shut down any complaint about what is going on. Dissidents will find themselves arrested, jailed, threatened and their lives put in danger. People are being subdued due to fear of being labelled a racist, a xenophobe and an Islamaphobe. 

 

The police are part of the system. They are operate as tools of the elite and can no longer be trusted to protect its citizens. Instead, they have been found to be used as weapons of oppression to silence those that dare raise a voice.

We have seen thousands of British girls being raped and authorities being prepared to do nothing except let it happen. The media, the politicians and the legislature have conspired to suppress action against those who would harm the most vulnerable. Instead, they chose to call anyone who calls them out as bigots and hatemongers when all they are doing is hiding their own crimes against humanity.

Hundreds of dissidents have found themselves being raided, arrested and charged for having the courage to speak up. The more prominent ones have been jailed and have suffered attacks while in jail. They have been threatened with murder and serious assault and these threats have been extended to their families.

Given that we no longer can rely on the police to protect dissidents effectively, is it not time to allow such individuals to legitimately keep firearms in their homes?

James A Williams

[wpvideo oX7TQc1C]

 

[simple-payment id=”46381″]

]]>

Skins and Borders

Skins, borders, protective layers and, what ever else you would like to call them, are natural barriers that separate an object from its surrounding environment. They occur everywhere across the universe from galaxies and solar systems to seashores and blood cells. They give an entity its integrity and are vital for the efficient management of systems. Without them we would not exist.

For a human settlement, the rule is the same. The borders of towns, tribes, families and countries are vital for the functioning and protection for all who reside within the different forms of human community. They are not created due to racism or xenophobia or any other arbitrary human interpretation.They are natural and necessary. Boundaries exist for a reason.

Chimes Media is reader funded. If you would be kind enough to donate please do so here: https://chimes.media/donations/

There is a donation button after the video at the bottom

 

Natures examples of skins and borders

Heliosphere

2g.Heliosphere_Image_main_BoundariesLgThe sun sends out a constant flow of charged particles called the solar wind, which ultimately travels past all the planets to some three times the distance to Pluto before being impeded by the interstellar medium. This forms a giant bubble around the sun and its planets, known as the heliosphere. 

 

Earth’s Magnetosphere

[gallery ids="46442,46443,46444"]

Enveloping our planet and protecting us from the fury of the Sun is a giant bubble of magnetism called the magnetosphere. It deflects most of the solar material sweeping towards us from our star at 1 million miles per hour or more. Without the magnetosphere, the relentless action of these solar particles could strip the Earth of its protective layers, which shield us from the Sun’s ultraviolet radiation.

FULL VIDEO

[wpvideo 3jsWqYkS]

 

[simple-payment id=”46381″]

[simple-payment id=”46392″]

]]>

Belief and Reality

Living by Faith

We live as blind beasts in a universe of infinite dimensional complexity, and we navigate our lives using a continuum of micro-assumptions. If we did not do so, life would be nigh on impossible to live since we would be constantly checking everything.

When you walk down a road, you are doing so in the belief that the ground beneath you will not open up and devour you. In the morning, you take for granted that the sun will bring daylight. Much of what we do is done through faith based on empirical reasoning and interpretative assumptions. The truth is, we really know so little about so much. Most of what we do and know is reliant on an unconscious faith in what we believe reality to be.

Nearly all of our knowledge is dependent on what others tell us either by word of mouth or through books, newspapers, TV or schools. However, much of what we are told, especially in social sciences and politics is based on subjective opinion, so how do we know what is reality and truth and what is propaganda and lies?

Hopefully, there are perhaps at least a small number of people who have gone beyond rejection and thoughtless acceptance of what they have been told and, by using the evidence at hand and whatever logical powers they command, have adopted a different way of looking at the question.

In this piece, I am deliberately avoiding the issue of religious faith except to say that whether a person chooses to believe in God or not is a binary one. You either believe or you do not. However, your choice either way is inevitably dependent on what your concept of God is and how you have been socialized to accept it or not. You have to have an image of what you believe God to be in order to either accept or reject it. 

Self Truths, Shared Truths and Interpretation

It is the subjective interpretation of both self-truths and shared-truths that can lead to the collective beliefs of group think. In its malignant  form and intelligent people are very much prone to it. 

Our existence is about existing at a ‘Now’ moment in time and we move through time from one ‘Now’ moment to the next. However, it is not as if we move from one point to another like moving from one dot to another, it is done smoothly. 

At each of these ‘Now’ points we experience and interact with the world about us. Each of these momentary experiences are self-truths in that they are events that happen to us personally. They are realities and thus personally objective to us.

Most self-truths are uneventful, but occasionally exciting and memorable things do happen and when they do they act like navigational beacons. These help give us bearings to the reality of existence of which we are part. How we interpret what we experience is subjective and is affected by many factors such as emotion, physical and biological circumstance, prior knowledge and social influence.

If we experience an event at the same time as others, that is a shared-truth. A shared truth is a collection of self-truths by all those who experience it. Again, it is an objective reality to all those who experience it, but each person will interpret the meaning of that shared-truth subjectively. Hence, that is why there is often a diversity of accounts over a shared event.

WATCH THE VIDEO

More to read below 

[wpvideo K2NjuVOQ]

Symptoms of Group Think

It is the subjective interpretation of both self-truths and shared-truths that can lead to the collective beliefs of group think. In its malignant form and intelligent people are very much prone to it. 

[gallery ids="46430,46431,46432,46433" type="slideshow"]

Irving Janis (Social Psychologist) identified eight different “symptoms” that indicate group-think:

  1. Illusions of invulnerability lead members of the group to be overly optimistic and engage in risk-taking.
  2. Unquestioned beliefs lead members to ignore possible moral problems and ignore consequences of individual and group actions.
  3. Rationalizing prevents members from reconsidering their beliefs and causes them to ignore warning signs.
  4. Stereotyping leads members of the in-group to ignore or even demonize out-group members who may oppose or challenge the group’s ideas.
  5. Self-censorship causes people who might have doubts to hide their fears or misgivings.
  6. “Mindguards” act as self-appointed censors to hide problematic information from the group.
  7. Illusions of unanimity lead members to believe that everyone is in agreement and feels the same way.
  8. Direct pressure to conform is often placed on members who pose questions, and those who question the group are often seen as disloyal or traitorous.

Causes

A number of factors can influence this psychological phenomenon. It tends to occur more in situations where group members are very similar to one another and it is more likely to take place when a powerful and charismatic leader commands the group. Situations where the group is placed under extreme stress or where moral dilemmas exist also increase the occurrence of group-think.

Benefits and Dangers

Group-think can have some benefits. When working with a large number of people, it often allows the group to make decisions, complete tasks, and finish projects quickly and efficiently.

However, this group-think is not without danger. The suppression of individual opinions and creative thought can lead to poor decision-making, gross inefficiencies, stubborn mindset and aggressive tendencies towards non-conformists.  

 

CHIMES MEDIA IS READER FUNDED SO A DONATION TO HEP US OUT WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED.

IF SUFFICIENT FUNDS CAN BE RAISED IT IS HOPE TO SET UP AN INTERNET RADIO STATION SO IF YOU WISH TO HELP TOWARDS THAT, AGAIN THAT WOULD BE REALLY GREAT!

 

[simple-payment id=”46381″]

[simple-payment id=”46394″]

]]>